Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 5 Turbo vs Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507

GLM 5 Turbo leads Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 26.6 to 7.5, and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs 13.3x less per output token ($0.30 vs $4.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 7 benchmarks have a result for both.

GLM 5 TurboZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.00
7
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Qwen
Coding
No data
Overall
41.5
Output $/M
$0.30
0
vs boards won of 7 shared

GLM 5 Turbo or Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
7
GLM 5 Turbo only
9
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 only
38
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 5 Turbo not benchmarked, Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 70.5 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: GLM 5 Turbo 98.5% against Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 28.1%, 70.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GLM 5 Turbo $4.00 against Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 $0.30 per million output tokens, 13.3x apart.
Context window
GLM 5 Turbo takes 203K tokens, Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGLM 5 TurboBarsQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Ties
Coding10
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning20
General20
All shared boards70
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10
Coding benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured70.7%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
SciCodeNot measured33.0%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)33.3%6.1%GLM 5 Turbo
ALE-Bench634.0Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1416Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1417Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
AA Intelligence Index26.67.5GLM 5 Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom98.5%28.1%GLM 5 Turbo
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)Not measured41.4%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)84.7%70.7%GLM 5 Turbo
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)27.8%10.3%GLM 5 Turbo
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured55.6%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1398Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1397Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1406Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
AA Math IndexNot measured66.3Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured66.3%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured62.2%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1394Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1411Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured80.5%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1393Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1392Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1387Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1389Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
Design Arena: websites1262Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Design Arena: UI components1260Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Design Arena: game dev1248Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Design Arena: data viz1264Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Design Arena: 3D1247Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Design Arena: all code categories1261Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Design Arena: SVG1205Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1160Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
General benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
IFBench73.2%50.7%GLM 5 Turbo
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)71.7%61.3%GLM 5 Turbo
DTBenchNot measured67.2%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMCANot measured22.4%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1384Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1363Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1317Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1391Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1372Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1432Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1379Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1337Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1330Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1419Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1404Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1369Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1353Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1378Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1378Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1336Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1334Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 5 Turbo$0.0032Fits in one request
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507$0.0002Fits in one request

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 5 Turbo$0.072Fits in one request
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507$0.0054Fits in one request

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 5 Turbo$0.280Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507$0.021Fits in one request

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 5 Turbo and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 5 TurboQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
MakerZ.aiQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMarch 15, 2026July 29, 2025
Context window203K262K
Input $/Mtok$1.20$0.09
Output $/Mtok$4.00$0.30
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 5 Turbo better than Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, GLM 5 Turbo or Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507?

GLM 5 Turbo costs $1.20 per million input tokens and $4.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs $0.09 and $0.30. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 5 Turbo or Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507?

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507, with 262K tokens against 203K.

How many benchmarks is the GLM 5 Turbo vs Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 comparison based on?

7 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GLM 5 Turbo's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next