Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 5 Turbo vs Nemotron 3 Super

GLM 5 Turbo leads Nemotron 3 Super on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 26.6 to 12.8, and Nemotron 3 Super costs 8.9x less per output token ($0.45 vs $4.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 8 benchmarks have a result for both.

GLM 5 TurboZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.00
8
Nemotron 3 SuperNVIDIA
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.45
0
vs boards won of 8 shared

GLM 5 Turbo or Nemotron 3 Super: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
8
GLM 5 Turbo only
8
Nemotron 3 Super only
31
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 5 Turbo not benchmarked, Nemotron 3 Super not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 30.7 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: GLM 5 Turbo 98.5% against Nemotron 3 Super 67.8%, 30.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GLM 5 Turbo $4.00 against Nemotron 3 Super $0.45 per million output tokens, 8.9x apart.
Context window
GLM 5 Turbo takes 203K tokens, Nemotron 3 Super 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGLM 5 TurboBarsNemotron 3 SuperTies
Coding20
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning20
General20
All shared boards80
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboNemotron 3 SuperLeader
AA Coding IndexNot measured37.7Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
SciCodeNot measured36.2%Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)33.3%28.8%GLM 5 Turbo
WeirdMLNot measured38.0%Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
ALE-Bench634.0213.9GLM 5 Turbo
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1403Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1409Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboNemotron 3 SuperLeader
AA Intelligence Index26.612.8GLM 5 Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboNemotron 3 SuperLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured1.7Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
τ²-Bench Telecom98.5%67.8%GLM 5 Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboNemotron 3 SuperLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)84.7%80.0%GLM 5 Turbo
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)27.8%20.8%GLM 5 Turbo
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1386Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1398Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1397Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboNemotron 3 SuperLeader
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1380Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1405Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
MathArenaNot measured16.6%Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboNemotron 3 SuperLeader
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1387Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1383Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1392Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1364Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboNemotron 3 SuperLeader
Design Arena: websites1262Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Design Arena: UI components1260Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Design Arena: game dev1248Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Design Arena: data viz1264Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Design Arena: 3D1247Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Design Arena: all code categories1261Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Design Arena: SVG1205Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1160Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
General benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboNemotron 3 SuperLeader
IFBench73.2%71.5%GLM 5 Turbo
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)71.7%65.7%GLM 5 Turbo
LMArena TextNot measured1378Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1347Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1317Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1400Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1356Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1431Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1341Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1403Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1418Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1336Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1346Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1369Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1362Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1332Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1336Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboNemotron 3 SuperLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 5 Turbo$0.0032Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Super$0.0003Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Super costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 5 Turbo$0.072Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Super$0.0056Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Super costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 5 Turbo$0.280Exceeds the context window
Nemotron 3 Super$0.021Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Super costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 5 Turbo and Nemotron 3 Super
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 5 TurboNVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super
MakerZ.aiNVIDIA
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMarch 15, 2026March 11, 2026
Context window203K262K
Input $/Mtok$1.20$0.085
Output $/Mtok$4.00$0.45
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 5 Turbo better than Nemotron 3 Super for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, GLM 5 Turbo or Nemotron 3 Super?

GLM 5 Turbo costs $1.20 per million input tokens and $4.00 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3 Super costs $0.085 and $0.45. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 5 Turbo or Nemotron 3 Super?

Nemotron 3 Super, with 262K tokens against 203K.

How many benchmarks is the GLM 5 Turbo vs Nemotron 3 Super comparison based on?

8 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GLM 5 Turbo's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Nemotron 3 Super's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next