Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 5 Turbo vs Mistral Small 3

GLM 5 Turbo leads Mistral Small 3 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 26.6 to 6.7, and Mistral Small 3 costs 50.0x less per output token ($0.08 vs $4.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 6 benchmarks have a result for both.

GLM 5 TurboZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.00
6
Mistral Small 3Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.08
0
vs boards won of 6 shared

GLM 5 Turbo or Mistral Small 3: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GLM 5 Turbo for a larger context window (203K against 33K tokens).

Shared results
6
GLM 5 Turbo only
10
Mistral Small 3 only
30
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 5 Turbo not benchmarked, Mistral Small 3 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 78.9 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: GLM 5 Turbo 98.5% against Mistral Small 3 19.6%, 78.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GLM 5 Turbo $4.00 against Mistral Small 3 $0.08 per million output tokens, 50.0x apart.
Context window
GLM 5 Turbo takes 203K tokens, Mistral Small 3 33K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGLM 5 TurboBarsMistral Small 3Ties
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning20
General20
All shared boards60
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index5 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboMistral Small 3Leader
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured25.2%Only Mistral Small 3 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)33.3%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
ALE-Bench634.0Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1246Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1248Only Mistral Small 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboMistral Small 3Leader
AA Intelligence Index26.66.7GLM 5 Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboMistral Small 3Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom98.5%19.6%GLM 5 Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboMistral Small 3Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)84.7%46.2%GLM 5 Turbo
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)27.8%3.8%GLM 5 Turbo
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1233Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1202Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1243Only Mistral Small 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboMistral Small 3Leader
AA Math IndexNot measured4.3Only Mistral Small 3 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured4.3%Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1240Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1243Only Mistral Small 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboMistral Small 3Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured65.2%Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1235Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1215Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1219Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1205Only Mistral Small 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboMistral Small 3Leader
Design Arena: websites1262Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Design Arena: UI components1260Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Design Arena: game dev1248Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Design Arena: data viz1264Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Design Arena: 3D1247Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Design Arena: all code categories1261Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Design Arena: SVG1205Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1160Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
General benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboMistral Small 3Leader
IFBench73.2%26.4%GLM 5 Turbo
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)71.7%0.0%GLM 5 Turbo
LMArena TextNot measured1234Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1214Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1194Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1256Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1198Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1204Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1211Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1111Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1188Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1204Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1216Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1217Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1246Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1214Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1184Only Mistral Small 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboMistral Small 3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 5 Turbo$0.0032Fits in one request
Mistral Small 3$0.0001Fits in one request

Mistral Small 3 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 5 Turbo$0.072Fits in one request
Mistral Small 3$0.0027Exceeds the context window

Mistral Small 3 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 5 Turbo$0.280Exceeds the context window
Mistral Small 3$0.011Exceeds the context window

Mistral Small 3 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 5 Turbo and Mistral Small 3
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 5 TurboMistral Small 3
MakerZ.aiMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMarch 15, 2026January 30, 2025
Context window203K33K
Input $/Mtok$1.20$0.05
Output $/Mtok$4.00$0.08
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 5 Turbo better than Mistral Small 3 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 5 Turbo for a larger context window (203K against 33K tokens).

Which is cheaper, GLM 5 Turbo or Mistral Small 3?

GLM 5 Turbo costs $1.20 per million input tokens and $4.00 per million output tokens; Mistral Small 3 costs $0.05 and $0.08. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 5 Turbo or Mistral Small 3?

GLM 5 Turbo, with 203K tokens against 33K.

How many benchmarks is the GLM 5 Turbo vs Mistral Small 3 comparison based on?

6 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GLM 5 Turbo's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Mistral Small 3's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next