Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 5 Turbo vs MiniMax M2

GLM 5 Turbo leads MiniMax M2 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 26.6 to 18.6, and MiniMax M2 costs 3.9x less per output token ($1.02 vs $4.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 14 benchmarks have a result for both.

GLM 5 TurboZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.00
14
MiniMax M2MiniMax
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.02
0
vs boards won of 14 shared

GLM 5 Turbo or MiniMax M2: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
14
GLM 5 Turbo only
2
MiniMax M2 only
36
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 5 Turbo not benchmarked, MiniMax M2 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Web design, 15.7 points apart on average over 7 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: 3D: GLM 5 Turbo 1247 against MiniMax M2 1098, 18.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GLM 5 Turbo $4.00 against MiniMax M2 $1.02 per million output tokens, 3.9x apart.
Context window
GLM 5 Turbo takes 203K tokens, MiniMax M2 205K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGLM 5 TurboBarsMiniMax M2Ties
Coding10
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning20
Web design70
General20
All shared boards140
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10
Coding benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboMiniMax M2Leader
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured61.0%Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1297Only MiniMax M2 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured82.6%Only MiniMax M2 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)33.3%25.8%GLM 5 Turbo
Terminal-BenchNot measured30.0%Only MiniMax M2 measured
ALE-Bench634.0Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1371Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1373Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1306Only MiniMax M2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboMiniMax M2Leader
AA Intelligence Index26.618.6GLM 5 Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboMiniMax M2Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom98.5%86.8%GLM 5 Turbo
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$161Only MiniMax M2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboMiniMax M2Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)84.7%77.7%GLM 5 Turbo
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)27.8%13.7%GLM 5 Turbo
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1357Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1338Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1376Only MiniMax M2 measured
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured57.8%Only MiniMax M2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboMiniMax M2Leader
AA Math IndexNot measured78.3Only MiniMax M2 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured78.3%Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1351Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1368Only MiniMax M2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboMiniMax M2Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured82.0%Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1348Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1367Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1349Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1336Only MiniMax M2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index70
Web design benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboMiniMax M2Leader
Design Arena: websites12621143GLM 5 Turbo
Design Arena: UI components12601134GLM 5 Turbo
Design Arena: game dev12481118GLM 5 Turbo
Design Arena: data viz12641140GLM 5 Turbo
Design Arena: 3D12471098GLM 5 Turbo
Design Arena: all code categories12611135GLM 5 Turbo
Design Arena: SVG12051100GLM 5 Turbo
Design Arena: ASCII art1160Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
General benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboMiniMax M2Leader
IFBench73.2%72.3%GLM 5 Turbo
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)71.7%64.3%GLM 5 Turbo
LMArena TextNot measured1340Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1329Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1286Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1364Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1313Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1366Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1357Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1336Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1326Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1330Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1312Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1361Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1331Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1295Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1298Only MiniMax M2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboMiniMax M2Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 5 Turbo$0.0032Fits in one request
MiniMax M2$0.0008Fits in one request

MiniMax M2 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 5 Turbo$0.072Fits in one request
MiniMax M2$0.016Fits in one request

MiniMax M2 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 5 Turbo$0.280Exceeds the context window
MiniMax M2$0.061Exceeds the context window

MiniMax M2 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 5 Turbo and MiniMax M2
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 5 TurboMiniMax M2
MakerZ.aiMiniMax
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMarch 15, 2026October 23, 2025
Context window203K205K
Input $/Mtok$1.20$0.255
Output $/Mtok$4.00$1.02
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.702
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 5 Turbo better than MiniMax M2 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, GLM 5 Turbo or MiniMax M2?

GLM 5 Turbo costs $1.20 per million input tokens and $4.00 per million output tokens; MiniMax M2 costs $0.255 and $1.02. Cost per solved task is known for MiniMax M2 only.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 5 Turbo or MiniMax M2?

MiniMax M2, with 205K tokens against 203K.

How many benchmarks is the GLM 5 Turbo vs MiniMax M2 comparison based on?

14 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GLM 5 Turbo's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and MiniMax M2's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next