Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 5 Turbo vs MiniMax M1

GLM 5 Turbo leads MiniMax M1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 26.6 to 11.7, and MiniMax M1 costs 1.8x less per output token ($2.20 vs $4.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 1 benchmarks have a result for both.

GLM 5 TurboZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.00
1
MiniMax M1MiniMax
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.20
0
vs boards won of 1 shared

GLM 5 Turbo or MiniMax M1: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
1
GLM 5 Turbo only
15
MiniMax M1 only
28
Like-for-like categories
1 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 5 Turbo not benchmarked, MiniMax M1 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Intelligence, 14.9 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Intelligence Index: GLM 5 Turbo 26.6 against MiniMax M1 11.7, 14.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GLM 5 Turbo $4.00 against MiniMax M1 $2.20 per million output tokens, 1.8x apart.
Context window
GLM 5 Turbo takes 203K tokens, MiniMax M1 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGLM 5 TurboBarsMiniMax M1Ties
Intelligence10
All shared boards10
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index4 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and MiniMax M1
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboMiniMax M1Leader
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)33.3%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
ALE-Bench634.0Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1359Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1359Only MiniMax M1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and MiniMax M1
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboMiniMax M1Leader
AA Intelligence Index26.611.7GLM 5 Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and MiniMax M1
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboMiniMax M1Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom98.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 41 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and MiniMax M1
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboMiniMax M1Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)84.7%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)27.8%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1339Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1317Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1353Only MiniMax M1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and MiniMax M1
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboMiniMax M1Leader
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1361Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1363Only MiniMax M1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and MiniMax M1
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboMiniMax M1Leader
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1354Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1355Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1337Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1319Only MiniMax M1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and MiniMax M1
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboMiniMax M1Leader
Design Arena: websites1262Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Design Arena: UI components1260Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Design Arena: game dev1248Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Design Arena: data viz1264Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Design Arena: 3D1247Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Design Arena: all code categories1261Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Design Arena: SVG1205Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1160Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index19 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and MiniMax M1
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboMiniMax M1Leader
IFBench73.2%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)71.7%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
LMArena TextNot measured1343Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1312Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1297Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1363Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1319Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1360Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1350Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1217Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1266Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1370Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1353Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1329Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1329Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1335Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1326Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1311Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1303Only MiniMax M1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and MiniMax M1
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboMiniMax M1Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 5 Turbo$0.0032Fits in one request
MiniMax M1$0.0015Fits in one request

MiniMax M1 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 5 Turbo$0.072Fits in one request
MiniMax M1$0.027Fits in one request

MiniMax M1 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 5 Turbo$0.280Exceeds the context window
MiniMax M1$0.102Fits in one request

MiniMax M1 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 5 Turbo and MiniMax M1
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 5 TurboMiniMax M1
MakerZ.aiMiniMax
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedMarch 15, 2026June 17, 2025
Context window203K1M
Input $/Mtok$1.20$0.40
Output $/Mtok$4.00$2.20
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 5 Turbo better than MiniMax M1 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, GLM 5 Turbo or MiniMax M1?

GLM 5 Turbo costs $1.20 per million input tokens and $4.00 per million output tokens; MiniMax M1 costs $0.40 and $2.20. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 5 Turbo or MiniMax M1?

MiniMax M1, with 1M tokens against 203K.

How many benchmarks is the GLM 5 Turbo vs MiniMax M1 comparison based on?

1 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GLM 5 Turbo's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and MiniMax M1's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next