Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 5 Turbo vs Llama Guard 4 12B

Llama Guard 4 12B costs 22.2x less per output token than GLM 5 Turbo ($0.18 vs $4.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Replace GLM 5 Turbo Replace Llama Guard 4 12B
GLM 5 TurboZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.00
Llama Guard 4 12BMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.18
vs $4.00 vs $0.18 per 1M output tokens. Llama Guard 4 12B is 22.2x cheaper.

GLM 5 Turbo or Llama Guard 4 12B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GLM 5 Turbo for a larger context window (203K against 164K tokens).

Model AGLM 5 TurboZ.aiNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BLlama Guard 4 12BMeta LlamaNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved task

No benchmark has tested both yet. GLM 5 Turbo has results on Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), ALE-Bench and AA Intelligence Index; Llama Guard 4 12B has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 5 Turbo not benchmarked, Llama Guard 4 12B not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
GLM 5 Turbo $4.00 against Llama Guard 4 12B $0.18 per million output tokens, 22.2x apart.
Context window
GLM 5 Turbo takes 203K tokens, Llama Guard 4 12B 164K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index2 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Llama Guard 4 12B
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboLlama Guard 4 12BLeader
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)33.3%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
ALE-Bench634.0Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Llama Guard 4 12B
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboLlama Guard 4 12BLeader
AA Intelligence Index26.6Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Llama Guard 4 12B
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboLlama Guard 4 12BLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom98.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Llama Guard 4 12B
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboLlama Guard 4 12BLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)84.7%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)27.8%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Llama Guard 4 12B
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboLlama Guard 4 12BLeader
Design Arena: websites1262Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Design Arena: UI components1260Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Design Arena: game dev1248Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Design Arena: data viz1264Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Design Arena: 3D1247Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Design Arena: all code categories1261Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Design Arena: SVG1205Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1160Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
General benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Llama Guard 4 12B
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboLlama Guard 4 12BLeader
IFBench73.2%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)71.7%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 44 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 5 Turbo$0.0032Fits in one request
Llama Guard 4 12B$0.0003Fits in one request

Llama Guard 4 12B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 5 Turbo$0.072Fits in one request
Llama Guard 4 12B$0.0095Fits in one request

Llama Guard 4 12B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 5 Turbo$0.280Exceeds the context window
Llama Guard 4 12B$0.038Exceeds the context window

Llama Guard 4 12B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 5 Turbo and Llama Guard 4 12B
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 5 TurboMeta Llama Guard 4 12B
MakerZ.aiMeta Llama
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMarch 15, 2026April 30, 2025
Context window203K164K
Input $/Mtok$1.20$0.18
Output $/Mtok$4.00$0.18
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 5 Turbo better than Llama Guard 4 12B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 5 Turbo for a larger context window (203K against 164K tokens).

Which is cheaper, GLM 5 Turbo or Llama Guard 4 12B?

GLM 5 Turbo costs $1.20 per million input tokens and $4.00 per million output tokens; Llama Guard 4 12B costs $0.18 and $0.18. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 5 Turbo or Llama Guard 4 12B?

GLM 5 Turbo, with 203K tokens against 164K.

Has any benchmark tested both GLM 5 Turbo and Llama Guard 4 12B?

No benchmark has tested both yet. GLM 5 Turbo has results on Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), ALE-Bench and AA Intelligence Index; Llama Guard 4 12B has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next