GLM 5 Turbo vs Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
GLM 5 Turbo leads Llama 3.2 1B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 26.6 to 4.8, and Llama 3.2 1B Instruct costs 19.9x less per output token ($0.201 vs $4.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 7 benchmarks have a result for both.
GLM 5 Turbo or Llama 3.2 1B Instruct: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick GLM 5 Turbo for a larger context window (203K against 60K tokens).
- Shared results
- 7
- GLM 5 Turbo only
- 9
- Llama 3.2 1B Instruct only
- 31
- Like-for-like categories
- 5 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
GLM 5 Turbo
GLM 5 Turbo leads, 26.6 against 4.8.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only GLM 5 Turbo has a Design Arena: websites result, 1262.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
GLM 5 Turbo
GLM 5 Turbo takes 203K tokens against 60K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
GLM 5 Turbo $0.0032, Llama 3.2 1B Instruct $0.0001 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- GLM 5 Turbo not benchmarked, Llama 3.2 1B Instruct not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- Agentic work, 98.5 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
- Widest single gap
- τ²-Bench Telecom: GLM 5 Turbo 98.5% against Llama 3.2 1B Instruct 0.0%, 98.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- GLM 5 Turbo $4.00 against Llama 3.2 1B Instruct $0.201 per million output tokens, 19.9x apart.
- Context window
- GLM 5 Turbo takes 203K tokens, Llama 3.2 1B Instruct 60K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | GLM 5 Turbo | Bars | Llama 3.2 1B Instruct | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 1 | 0 | ||
| Intelligence | 1 | 0 | ||
| Agentic work | 1 | 0 | ||
| Reasoning | 2 | 0 | ||
| General | 2 | 0 | ||
| All shared boards | 7 | 0 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10
| Benchmark | GLM 5 Turbo | Llama 3.2 1B Instruct | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 1.9% | Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 33.3% | 0.0% | GLM 5 Turbo |
| ALE-Bench | 634.0 | Not measured | Only GLM 5 Turbo measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | Not measured | 1070 | Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | Not measured | 1056 | Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | GLM 5 Turbo | Llama 3.2 1B Instruct | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 26.6 | 4.8 | GLM 5 Turbo |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | GLM 5 Turbo | Llama 3.2 1B Instruct | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 98.5% | 0.0% | GLM 5 Turbo |
| BALROG | Not measured | 6.6% | Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) | Not measured | 10.8% | Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | GLM 5 Turbo | Llama 3.2 1B Instruct | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 84.7% | 19.6% | GLM 5 Turbo |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 27.8% | 5.5% | GLM 5 Turbo |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | Not measured | 23.9% | Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | Not measured | 1044 | Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | Not measured | 1007 | Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | Not measured | 1087 | Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here | |||
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GLM 5 Turbo | Llama 3.2 1B Instruct | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Math Index | Not measured | 0.0 | Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 0.0% | Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | Not measured | 0.6% | Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: math | Not measured | 1086 | Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | Not measured | 1098 | Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here | |||
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GLM 5 Turbo | Llama 3.2 1B Instruct | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 20.0% | Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: science | Not measured | 1055 | Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | Not measured | 1009 | Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | Not measured | 1071 | Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | Not measured | 1000 | Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GLM 5 Turbo | Llama 3.2 1B Instruct | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1262 | Not measured | Only GLM 5 Turbo measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1263 | Not measured | Only GLM 5 Turbo measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1248 | Not measured | Only GLM 5 Turbo measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1264 | Not measured | Only GLM 5 Turbo measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1248 | Not measured | Only GLM 5 Turbo measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1262 | Not measured | Only GLM 5 Turbo measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1206 | Not measured | Only GLM 5 Turbo measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1160 | Not measured | Only GLM 5 Turbo measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | GLM 5 Turbo | Llama 3.2 1B Instruct | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFBench | 73.2% | 22.8% | GLM 5 Turbo |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 71.7% | 6.7% | GLM 5 Turbo |
| LMArena Text | Not measured | 1055 | Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | Not measured | 1031 | Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | Not measured | 1033 | Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: English | Not measured | 1117 | Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | Not measured | 973 | Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | Not measured | 959 | Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: German | Not measured | 1014 | Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | Not measured | 941 | Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | Not measured | 1030 | Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | Not measured | 1050 | Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | Not measured | 1030 | Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | Not measured | 1025 | Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GLM 5 Turbo | Llama 3.2 1B Instruct | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Z.ai GLM 5 Turbo | Meta Llama 3.2 1B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Z.ai | Meta Llama |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | March 15, 2026 | September 25, 2024 |
| Context window | 203K | 60K |
| Input $/Mtok | $1.20 | $0.027 |
| Output $/Mtok | $4.00 | $0.201 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is GLM 5 Turbo better than Llama 3.2 1B Instruct for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 5 Turbo for a larger context window (203K against 60K tokens).
Which is cheaper, GLM 5 Turbo or Llama 3.2 1B Instruct?
GLM 5 Turbo costs $1.20 per million input tokens and $4.00 per million output tokens; Llama 3.2 1B Instruct costs $0.027 and $0.201. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, GLM 5 Turbo or Llama 3.2 1B Instruct?
GLM 5 Turbo, with 203K tokens against 60K.
How many benchmarks is the GLM 5 Turbo vs Llama 3.2 1B Instruct comparison based on?
7 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GLM 5 Turbo's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Llama 3.2 1B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.