Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Qwen3 Coder Flash

Qwen3 Coder Flash costs 1.3x less per output token than GLM 5.3 FlashX ($0.975 vs $1.25 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Replace GLM 5.3 FlashX Replace Qwen3 Coder Flash
GLM 5.3 FlashXZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.25
Qwen3 Coder FlashQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.975
vs $1.25 vs $0.975 per 1M output tokens. Qwen3 Coder Flash is 1.3x cheaper.

GLM 5.3 FlashX or Qwen3 Coder Flash: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GLM 5.3 FlashX for a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens).

Model AGLM 5.3 FlashXZ.aiNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BQwen3 Coder FlashQwenNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved task

No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 5.3 FlashX not benchmarked, Qwen3 Coder Flash not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
GLM 5.3 FlashX $1.25 against Qwen3 Coder Flash $0.975 per million output tokens, 1.3x apart.
Context window
GLM 5.3 FlashX takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3 Coder Flash 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 5.3 FlashX$0.0010Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder Flash$0.0007Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 5.3 FlashX$0.022Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder Flash$0.013Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 5.3 FlashX$0.086Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder Flash$0.049Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 5.3 FlashX and Qwen3 Coder Flash
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 5.3 FlashXQwen3 Coder Flash
MakerZ.aiQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedSeptember 18, 2026September 17, 2025
Context window1.05M1M
Input $/Mtok$0.37$0.195
Output $/Mtok$1.25$0.975
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 5.3 FlashX better than Qwen3 Coder Flash for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 5.3 FlashX for a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens).

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 FlashX or Qwen3 Coder Flash?

GLM 5.3 FlashX costs $0.37 per million input tokens and $1.25 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Coder Flash costs $0.195 and $0.975. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 5.3 FlashX or Qwen3 Coder Flash?

GLM 5.3 FlashX, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

Has any benchmark tested both GLM 5.3 FlashX and Qwen3 Coder Flash?

No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next