Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Mercury 3

Mercury 3 costs 3.6x less per output token than GLM 5.3 FlashX ($0.35 vs $1.25 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

GLM 5.3 FlashXZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.25
Mercury 3Inception
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.35
vs $1.25 vs $0.35 per 1M output tokens. Mercury 3 is 3.6x cheaper.

GLM 5.3 FlashX or Mercury 3: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GLM 5.3 FlashX for a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens).

No benchmark has tested both yet. GLM 5.3 FlashX has none yet; Mercury 3 on Design Arena: websites, Design Arena: UI components and Design Arena: game dev. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 5.3 FlashX not benchmarked, Mercury 3 not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
GLM 5.3 FlashX $1.25 against Mercury 3 $0.35 per million output tokens, 3.6x apart.
Context window
GLM 5.3 FlashX takes 1.05M tokens, Mercury 3 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for GLM 5.3 FlashX and Mercury 3
BenchmarkGLM 5.3 FlashXMercury 3Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1244Only Mercury 3 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1270Only Mercury 3 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1227Only Mercury 3 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1207Only Mercury 3 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1240Only Mercury 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 5.3 FlashX$0.0010Fits in one request
Mercury 3$0.0003Fits in one request

Mercury 3 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 5.3 FlashX$0.022Fits in one request
Mercury 3$0.0060Fits in one request

Mercury 3 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 5.3 FlashX$0.086Fits in one request
Mercury 3$0.024Fits in one request

Mercury 3 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 5.3 FlashX and Mercury 3
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 5.3 FlashXInception Mercury 3
MakerZ.aiInception
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedSeptember 18, 2026October 16, 2026
Context window1.05M1M
Input $/Mtok$0.37$0.10
Output $/Mtok$1.25$0.35
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 5.3 FlashX better than Mercury 3 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 5.3 FlashX for a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens).

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 FlashX or Mercury 3?

GLM 5.3 FlashX costs $0.37 per million input tokens and $1.25 per million output tokens; Mercury 3 costs $0.10 and $0.35. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 5.3 FlashX or Mercury 3?

GLM 5.3 FlashX, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

Has any benchmark tested both GLM 5.3 FlashX and Mercury 3?

No benchmark has tested both yet. GLM 5.3 FlashX has none yet; Mercury 3 on Design Arena: websites, Design Arena: UI components and Design Arena: game dev. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next