Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Super

GLM 4.7 Flash leads Nemotron 3 Super on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 14.9 to 12.8, at about the same output price ($0.40 vs $0.45 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 33 benchmarks have a result for both.

GLM 4.7 FlashZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
42.1
Output $/M
$0.40
2
Nemotron 3 SuperNVIDIA
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.45
31
vs boards won of 33 shared

GLM 4.7 Flash or Nemotron 3 Super: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GLM 4.7 Flash for output tokens 1.1x cheaper ($0.40 vs $0.45 per million) and work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Shared results
33
GLM 4.7 Flash only
10
Nemotron 3 Super only
6
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 4.7 Flash not benchmarked, Nemotron 3 Super not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 31.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: GLM 4.7 Flash 98.8% against Nemotron 3 Super 67.8%, 31.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GLM 4.7 Flash $0.40 against Nemotron 3 Super $0.45 per million output tokens, 1.1x apart.
Context window
GLM 4.7 Flash takes 200K tokens, Nemotron 3 Super 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGLM 4.7 FlashBarsNemotron 3 SuperTies
Coding03
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge04
General017
All shared boards231
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashNemotron 3 SuperLeader
AA Coding IndexNot measured37.7Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
SciCodeNot measured36.2%Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)22.0%28.8%Nemotron 3 Super
WeirdMLNot measured38.0%Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
ALE-BenchNot measured213.9Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: coding13821404Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: software and IT13891409Nemotron 3 Super
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashNemotron 3 SuperLeader
AA Intelligence Index14.912.8GLM 4.7 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashNemotron 3 SuperLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured1.7Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
τ²-Bench Telecom98.8%67.8%GLM 4.7 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashNemotron 3 SuperLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)58.1%80.0%Nemotron 3 Super
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)7.6%20.8%Nemotron 3 Super
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)60.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13561386Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: expert13571398Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13701397Nemotron 3 Super
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashNemotron 3 SuperLeader
OTIS Mock AIME58.3%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: math13551380Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: mathematical work13691405Nemotron 3 Super
MathArenaNot measured16.6%Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashNemotron 3 SuperLeader
LMArena Text: science13581388Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13431383Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: legal and government13581392Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: business and finance13431364Nemotron 3 Super
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashNemotron 3 SuperLeader
Design Arena: websites1194Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: UI components1205Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: game dev1134Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: data viz1123Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: 3D1121Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: all code categories1177Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: SVG1037Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index017
General benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashNemotron 3 SuperLeader
IFBench60.8%71.5%Nemotron 3 Super
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)41.7%65.7%Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text13511378Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: instruction following13271347Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: creative writing12961317Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: English13731400Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: non-English13301356Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: Chinese14031432Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: German13361341Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: Korean1283Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: French13321403Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: Spanish13501418Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: Russian13331336Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: Polish12901346Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: multi-turn13421369Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: longer queries13441362Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: writing and language13201331Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13041336Nemotron 3 Super
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashNemotron 3 SuperLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 4.7 Flash$0.0003Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Super$0.0003Fits in one request

GLM 4.7 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 4.7 Flash$0.0045Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Super$0.0056Fits in one request

GLM 4.7 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 4.7 Flash$0.017Exceeds the context window
Nemotron 3 Super$0.021Fits in one request

GLM 4.7 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 4.7 Flash and Nemotron 3 Super
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 4.7 FlashNVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super
MakerZ.aiNVIDIA
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedJanuary 19, 2026March 11, 2026
Context window200K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.0653$0.085
Output $/Mtok$0.40$0.45
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 4.7 Flash better than Nemotron 3 Super for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 4.7 Flash for output tokens 1.1x cheaper ($0.40 vs $0.45 per million) and work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GLM 4.7 Flash or Nemotron 3 Super?

GLM 4.7 Flash costs $0.0653 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3 Super costs $0.085 and $0.45. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 4.7 Flash or Nemotron 3 Super?

Nemotron 3 Super, with 262K tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks is the GLM 4.7 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Super comparison based on?

33 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. GLM 4.7 Flash's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Nemotron 3 Super's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next