Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Hermes 3 70B Instruct

GLM 4.7 Flash leads Hermes 3 70B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 14.9 to 6.7, and GLM 4.7 Flash costs 1.7x less per output token ($0.40 vs $0.70 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 3 benchmarks have a result for both.

GLM 4.7 FlashZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
42.1
Output $/M
$0.40
3
N Hermes 3 70B InstructNous Research
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.70
0
vs boards won of 3 shared

GLM 4.7 Flash or Hermes 3 70B Instruct: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GLM 4.7 Flash for output tokens 1.7x cheaper ($0.40 vs $0.70 per million) and a larger context window (200K against 131K tokens).

Shared results
3
GLM 4.7 Flash only
40
Hermes 3 70B Instruct only
2
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 4.7 Flash not benchmarked, Hermes 3 70B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
Reasoning, 10.8 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run): GLM 4.7 Flash 58.1% against Hermes 3 70B Instruct 40.1%, 18.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GLM 4.7 Flash $0.40 against Hermes 3 70B Instruct $0.70 per million output tokens, 1.7x apart.
Context window
GLM 4.7 Flash takes 200K tokens, Hermes 3 70B Instruct 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGLM 4.7 FlashBarsHermes 3 70B InstructTies
Intelligence10
Reasoning20
All shared boards30
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index4 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and Hermes 3 70B Instruct
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashHermes 3 70B InstructLeader
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured18.8%Only Hermes 3 70B Instruct measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)22.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: coding1382Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1389Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and Hermes 3 70B Instruct
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashHermes 3 70B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index14.96.7GLM 4.7 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and Hermes 3 70B Instruct
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashHermes 3 70B InstructLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom98.8%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 41 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and Hermes 3 70B Instruct
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashHermes 3 70B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)58.1%40.1%GLM 4.7 Flash
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)7.6%4.0%GLM 4.7 Flash
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)60.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1356Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: expert1357Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1370Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and Hermes 3 70B Instruct
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashHermes 3 70B InstructLeader
OTIS Mock AIME58.3%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: math1355Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1369Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and Hermes 3 70B Instruct
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashHermes 3 70B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured57.1%Only Hermes 3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science1358Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1343Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1358Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1343Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and Hermes 3 70B Instruct
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashHermes 3 70B InstructLeader
Design Arena: websites1194Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: UI components1205Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: game dev1134Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: data viz1123Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: 3D1121Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: all code categories1177Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: SVG1037Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index18 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and Hermes 3 70B Instruct
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashHermes 3 70B InstructLeader
IFBench60.8%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)41.7%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text1351Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1327Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1296Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: English1373Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: non-English1330Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1403Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: German1336Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Korean1283Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: French1332Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1350Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Russian1333Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Polish1290Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1342Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1344Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1320Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1304Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and Hermes 3 70B Instruct
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashHermes 3 70B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 4.7 Flash$0.0003Fits in one request
Hermes 3 70B Instruct$0.0010Fits in one request

GLM 4.7 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 4.7 Flash$0.0045Fits in one request
Hermes 3 70B Instruct$0.037Fits in one request

GLM 4.7 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 4.7 Flash$0.017Exceeds the context window
Hermes 3 70B Instruct$0.147Exceeds the context window

GLM 4.7 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 4.7 Flash and Hermes 3 70B Instruct
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 4.7 FlashNous Hermes 3 70B Instruct
MakerZ.aiNous Research
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedJanuary 19, 2026August 18, 2024
Context window200K131K
Input $/Mtok$0.0653$0.70
Output $/Mtok$0.40$0.70
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 4.7 Flash better than Hermes 3 70B Instruct for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 4.7 Flash for output tokens 1.7x cheaper ($0.40 vs $0.70 per million) and a larger context window (200K against 131K tokens).

Which is cheaper, GLM 4.7 Flash or Hermes 3 70B Instruct?

GLM 4.7 Flash costs $0.0653 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Hermes 3 70B Instruct costs $0.70 and $0.70. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 4.7 Flash or Hermes 3 70B Instruct?

GLM 4.7 Flash, with 200K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the GLM 4.7 Flash vs Hermes 3 70B Instruct comparison based on?

3 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. GLM 4.7 Flash's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Hermes 3 70B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next