Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 4.7 Flash vs GLM 5V Turbo

GLM 5V Turbo leads GLM 4.7 Flash on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 23.5 to 14.9, and GLM 4.7 Flash costs 10.0x less per output token ($0.40 vs $4.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 41 benchmarks have a result for both.

GLM 4.7 FlashZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
42.1
Output $/M
$0.40
1
GLM 5V TurboZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.00
40
vs boards won of 41 shared

GLM 4.7 Flash or GLM 5V Turbo: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GLM 4.7 Flash for output tokens 10.0x cheaper ($0.40 vs $4.00 per million) and work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Shared results
41
GLM 4.7 Flash only
2
GLM 5V Turbo only
24
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 4.7 Flash not benchmarked, GLM 5V Turbo not benchmarked.
Widest category
General, 16.5 points apart on average over 18 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): GLM 4.7 Flash 41.7% against GLM 5V Turbo 70.3%, 28.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GLM 4.7 Flash $0.40 against GLM 5V Turbo $4.00 per million output tokens, 10.0x apart.
Context window
GLM 4.7 Flash takes 200K tokens, GLM 5V Turbo 203K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGLM 4.7 FlashBarsGLM 5V TurboTies
Coding03
Intelligence01
Agentic work10
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge04
Web design07
General018
All shared boards140
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashGLM 5V TurboLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1402Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)22.0%32.6%GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: coding13821466GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: software and IT13891460GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1386Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1356Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1425Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashGLM 5V TurboLeader
AA Intelligence Index14.923.5GLM 5V Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashGLM 5V TurboLeader
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1124Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1149Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1134Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1267Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured957Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1102Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1120Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1152Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
τ²-Bench Telecom98.8%98.5%GLM 4.7 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashGLM 5V TurboLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)58.1%80.9%GLM 5V Turbo
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)7.6%17.1%GLM 5V Turbo
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)60.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13561443GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: expert13571453GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13691456GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1286Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1273Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashGLM 5V TurboLeader
OTIS Mock AIME58.3%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: math13551442GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: mathematical work13691447GLM 5V Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashGLM 5V TurboLeader
LMArena Text: science13581448GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13431433GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: legal and government13571436GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: business and finance13431435GLM 5V Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index07
Web design benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashGLM 5V TurboLeader
Design Arena: websites11941230GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: UI components12081213GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: game dev11351219GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: data viz11231202GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: 3D11211209GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: all code categories11781228GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: SVG10381151GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1117Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index018
General benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashGLM 5V TurboLeader
IFBench60.8%61.1%GLM 5V Turbo
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)41.7%70.3%GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text13511437GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: instruction following13271423GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: creative writing12961417GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena VisionNot measured1264Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: English13731454GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: non-English13301420GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Chinese14031491GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: German13361422GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Korean12831397GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: French13321443GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Spanish13501452GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Russian13331432GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Polish12911432GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: multi-turn13421431GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: longer queries13451438GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: writing and language13201420GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13041407GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1274Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1329Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1270Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1268Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1264Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1241Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1252Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1416Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashGLM 5V TurboLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 4.7 Flash$0.0003Fits in one request
GLM 5V Turbo$0.0032Fits in one request

GLM 4.7 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 4.7 Flash$0.0045Fits in one request
GLM 5V Turbo$0.072Fits in one request

GLM 4.7 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 4.7 Flash$0.017Exceeds the context window
GLM 5V Turbo$0.280Exceeds the context window

GLM 4.7 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 4.7 Flash and GLM 5V Turbo
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 4.7 FlashZ.ai GLM 5V Turbo
MakerZ.aiZ.ai
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedJanuary 19, 2026April 1, 2026
Context window200K203K
Input $/Mtok$0.0653$1.20
Output $/Mtok$0.40$4.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 4.7 Flash better than GLM 5V Turbo for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 4.7 Flash for output tokens 10.0x cheaper ($0.40 vs $4.00 per million) and work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GLM 4.7 Flash or GLM 5V Turbo?

GLM 4.7 Flash costs $0.0653 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; GLM 5V Turbo costs $1.20 and $4.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 4.7 Flash or GLM 5V Turbo?

GLM 5V Turbo, with 203K tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks is the GLM 4.7 Flash vs GLM 5V Turbo comparison based on?

41 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GLM 4.7 Flash's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and GLM 5V Turbo's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next