GLM 4.6V vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
GLM 4.6V leads Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 11.2 to 9.6, and GLM 4.6V costs 1.2x less per output token ($0.90 vs $1.10 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 31 benchmarks have a result for both.
GLM 4.6V or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick GLM 4.6V for output tokens 1.2x cheaper ($0.90 vs $1.10 per million) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.
- Shared results
- 31
- GLM 4.6V only
- 7
- Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct only
- 10
- Like-for-like categories
- 7 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
GLM 4.6V
GLM 4.6V leads, 11.2 against 9.6.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct takes 262K tokens against 131K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
GLM 4.6V $0.0008, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct $0.0006 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- GLM 4.6V not benchmarked, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- Coding, 14.9 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run): GLM 4.6V 41.1% against Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct 78.4%, 37.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- GLM 4.6V $0.90 against Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct $1.10 per million output tokens, 1.2x apart.
- Context window
- GLM 4.6V takes 131K tokens, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct 262K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | GLM 4.6V | Bars | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 1 | 3 | ||
| Intelligence | 1 | 0 | ||
| Agentic work | 0 | 1 | ||
| Reasoning | 0 | 5 | ||
| Math | 2 | 0 | ||
| Knowledge | 0 | 5 | ||
| General | 1 | 12 | ||
| All shared boards | 5 | 26 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index13
| Benchmark | GLM 4.6V | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 41.1% | 78.4% | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 14.4% | 9.8% | GLM 4.6V |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1389 | 1440 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1391 | 1447 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct |
| Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | GLM 4.6V | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 11.2 | 9.6 | GLM 4.6V |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | GLM 4.6V | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 31.6% | 41.5% | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct |
| Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
| Benchmark | GLM 4.6V | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 71.9% | 75.9% | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 9.6% | 12.6% | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1367 | 1428 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1371 | 1417 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1391 | 1431 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1182 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.6V measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1155 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.6V measured |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | Not measured | 66.7% | Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | GLM 4.6V | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Math Index | 85.3 | 84.3 | GLM 4.6V |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | 85.3% | 84.3% | GLM 4.6V |
| LMArena Text: math | Not measured | 1440 | Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | Not measured | 1434 | Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
| Benchmark | GLM 4.6V | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 79.9% | 82.4% | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct |
| LMArena Text: science | 1389 | 1434 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1389 | 1455 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1393 | 1431 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1359 | 1422 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct |
| Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here | |||
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GLM 4.6V | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 9 boards here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index112
| Benchmark | GLM 4.6V | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFBench | 30.1% | 60.7% | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 48.7% | 63.7% | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct |
| Fiction.LiveBench | Not measured | 55.6% | Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text | 1376 | 1417 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1350 | 1388 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1347 | 1333 | GLM 4.6V |
| LMArena Vision | 1164 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.6V measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1395 | 1421 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1358 | 1407 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1425 | 1460 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct |
| LMArena Text: German | Not measured | 1416 | Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | Not measured | 1395 | Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | Not measured | 1363 | Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: French | Not measured | 1414 | Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | Not measured | 1435 | Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1339 | 1404 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct |
| LMArena Text: Polish | Not measured | 1398 | Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1359 | 1416 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1357 | 1402 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1347 | 1355 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1343 | 1349 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1179 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.6V measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | 1217 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.6V measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1171 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.6V measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1113 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.6V measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GLM 4.6V | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Z.ai GLM 4.6V | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Z.ai | Qwen |
| Weights | Open weights | Open weights |
| Released | December 8, 2025 | September 11, 2025 |
| Context window | 131K | 262K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.30 | $0.10 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.90 | $1.10 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is GLM 4.6V better than Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 4.6V for output tokens 1.2x cheaper ($0.90 vs $1.10 per million) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.
Which is cheaper, GLM 4.6V or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct?
GLM 4.6V costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $0.90 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct costs $0.10 and $1.10. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, GLM 4.6V or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct?
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct, with 262K tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks is the GLM 4.6V vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct comparison based on?
31 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GLM 4.6V's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.