GLM 4.5V vs Mistral Large 2407
GLM 4.5V and Mistral Large 2407 tie on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index at 7.6, and GLM 4.5V costs 3.3x less per output token ($1.80 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 10 benchmarks have a result for both.
GLM 4.5V or Mistral Large 2407: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick GLM 4.5V for output tokens 3.3x cheaper ($1.80 vs $6.00 per million) and work measured by τ²-Bench Telecom or Long context reasoning (AA-LCR), where it leads.
- Shared results
- 10
- GLM 4.5V only
- 30
- Mistral Large 2407 only
- 7
- Like-for-like categories
- 7 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
No call
Tied at 7.6.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
Mistral Large 2407
Mistral Large 2407 takes 131K tokens against 66K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
GLM 4.5V
GLM 4.5V $0.0015, Mistral Large 2407 $0.0050 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- GLM 4.5V not benchmarked, Mistral Large 2407 not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- Math, 73.0 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- AA Math Index: GLM 4.5V 73.0 against Mistral Large 2407 0.0, 73.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- GLM 4.5V $1.80 against Mistral Large 2407 $6.00 per million output tokens, 3.3x apart.
- Context window
- GLM 4.5V takes 66K tokens, Mistral Large 2407 131K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | GLM 4.5V | Bars | Mistral Large 2407 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 1 | 0 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 0 | 1 tie | |
| Agentic work | 0 | 1 | ||
| Reasoning | 2 | 0 | ||
| Math | 2 | 0 | ||
| Knowledge | 1 | 0 | ||
| General | 1 | 1 | ||
| All shared boards | 7 | 2 | 1 tie |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10
| Benchmark | GLM 4.5V | Mistral Large 2407 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 60.4% | 26.7% | GLM 4.5V |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 6.8% | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5V measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1347 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5V measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1353 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5V measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index00
| Benchmark | GLM 4.5V | Mistral Large 2407 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 7.6 | 7.6 | Tie |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | GLM 4.5V | Mistral Large 2407 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 22.5% | 33.0% | Mistral Large 2407 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | GLM 4.5V | Mistral Large 2407 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 68.4% | 47.2% | GLM 4.5V |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 6.3% | 2.9% | GLM 4.5V |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | Not measured | 49.0% | Only Mistral Large 2407 measured |
| SimpleBench | Not measured | 22.5% | Only Mistral Large 2407 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1335 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5V measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1353 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5V measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1357 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5V measured |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1151 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5V measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1163 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5V measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | GLM 4.5V | Mistral Large 2407 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Math Index | 73.0 | 0.0 | GLM 4.5V |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | 73.0% | 0.0% | GLM 4.5V |
| OTIS Mock AIME | Not measured | 8.5% | Only Mistral Large 2407 measured |
| MATH level 5 | Not measured | 44.8% | Only Mistral Large 2407 measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1354 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5V measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1336 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5V measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | GLM 4.5V | Mistral Large 2407 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 78.8% | 68.3% | GLM 4.5V |
| MMLU | Not measured | 80.0% | Only Mistral Large 2407 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1330 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5V measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1349 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5V measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1338 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5V measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1309 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5V measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here | |||
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GLM 4.5V | Mistral Large 2407 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 9 boards here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
| Benchmark | GLM 4.5V | Mistral Large 2407 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFBench | 34.2% | 31.6% | GLM 4.5V |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 0.0% | 2.0% | Mistral Large 2407 |
| DTBench | Not measured | 61.2% | Only Mistral Large 2407 measured |
| Creative writing (Lech Mazur) | Not measured | 69.0% | Only Mistral Large 2407 measured |
| LMArena Text | 1333 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5V measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1311 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5V measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1294 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5V measured |
| LMArena Vision | 1154 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5V measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1362 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5V measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1303 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5V measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1337 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5V measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1336 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5V measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1298 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5V measured |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1302 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5V measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1333 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5V measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1305 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5V measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1302 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5V measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1303 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5V measured |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1183 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5V measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1151 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5V measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GLM 4.5V | Mistral Large 2407 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
GLM 4.5V costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
GLM 4.5V costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
GLM 4.5V costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Z.ai GLM 4.5V | Mistral Large 2407 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Z.ai | Mistral AI |
| Weights | Open weights | No public weights listed |
| Released | August 11, 2025 | November 19, 2024 |
| Context window | 66K | 131K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.60 | $2.00 |
| Output $/Mtok | $1.80 | $6.00 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is GLM 4.5V better than Mistral Large 2407 for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 4.5V for output tokens 3.3x cheaper ($1.80 vs $6.00 per million) and work measured by τ²-Bench Telecom or Long context reasoning (AA-LCR), where it leads.
Which is cheaper, GLM 4.5V or Mistral Large 2407?
GLM 4.5V costs $0.60 per million input tokens and $1.80 per million output tokens; Mistral Large 2407 costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, GLM 4.5V or Mistral Large 2407?
Mistral Large 2407, with 131K tokens against 66K.
How many benchmarks is the GLM 4.5V vs Mistral Large 2407 comparison based on?
10 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GLM 4.5V's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Mistral Large 2407's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.