Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 4.5 Air vs Hy3 preview

Hy3 preview leads GLM 4.5 Air on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 25.3 to 11.1, and Hy3 preview costs 1.8x less per output token ($0.60 vs $1.10 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 31 benchmarks have a result for both.

GLM 4.5 AirZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.10
1
Hy3 previewTencent
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
30
vs boards won of 31 shared

GLM 4.5 Air or Hy3 preview: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GLM 4.5 Air for work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Shared results
31
GLM 4.5 Air only
17
Hy3 preview only
5
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 4.5 Air not benchmarked, Hy3 preview not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 46.2 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: GLM 4.5 Air 46.5% against Hy3 preview 92.7%, 46.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GLM 4.5 Air $1.10 against Hy3 preview $0.60 per million output tokens, 1.8x apart.
Context window
GLM 4.5 Air takes 131K tokens, Hy3 preview 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGLM 4.5 AirBarsHy3 previewTies
Coding03
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge04
General114
All shared boards130
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirHy3 previewLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1357Only Hy3 preview measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured58.8Only Hy3 preview measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)68.4%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)20.5%34.1%Hy3 preview
GSO-Bench2.9%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: coding13971421Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: software and IT14011423Hy3 preview
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1349Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1356Only Hy3 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirHy3 previewLeader
AA Intelligence Index11.125.3Hy3 preview
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirHy3 previewLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured24.1Only Hy3 preview measured
τ²-Bench Telecom46.5%92.7%Hy3 preview
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirHy3 previewLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)73.3%86.7%Hy3 preview
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)7.0%27.8%Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: hard prompts13791413Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: expert13701422Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13881416Hy3 preview
Kagi LLM Benchmark43.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirHy3 previewLeader
AA Math Index80.7Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)80.7%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: math13961424Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: mathematical work13961442Hy3 preview
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirHy3 previewLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)81.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: science14071416Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14021405Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: legal and government13821430Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: business and finance13711397Hy3 preview
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirHy3 previewLeader
Design Arena: websites1146Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Design Arena: UI components1120Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Design Arena: game dev1094Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Design Arena: data viz1186Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Design Arena: 3D1122Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Design Arena: all code categories1137Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Design Arena: SVG1071Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index114
General benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirHy3 previewLeader
IFBench37.6%63.1%Hy3 preview
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)46.7%64.7%Hy3 preview
LMArena Text13841401Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: instruction following13541383Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: creative writing13431339GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: English13971409Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: non-English13661390Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: Chinese14261435Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: German1377Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1348Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: Korean1308Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: French14001425Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: Spanish13851399Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: Russian13731399Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: Polish1368Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn13711411Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: longer queries13661402Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: writing and language13541370Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13391352Hy3 preview
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirHy3 previewLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 4.5 Air$0.0008Fits in one request
Hy3 preview$0.0005Fits in one request

Hy3 preview costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 4.5 Air$0.013Fits in one request
Hy3 preview$0.011Fits in one request

Hy3 preview costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 4.5 Air$0.051Exceeds the context window
Hy3 preview$0.042Fits in one request

Hy3 preview costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 4.5 Air and Hy3 preview
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 4.5 AirTencent Hy3 preview
MakerZ.aiTencent
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 25, 2025April 22, 2026
Context window131K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.20$0.18
Output $/Mtok$1.10$0.60
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 4.5 Air better than Hy3 preview for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 4.5 Air for work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GLM 4.5 Air or Hy3 preview?

GLM 4.5 Air costs $0.20 per million input tokens and $1.10 per million output tokens; Hy3 preview costs $0.18 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 4.5 Air or Hy3 preview?

Hy3 preview, with 262K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the GLM 4.5 Air vs Hy3 preview comparison based on?

31 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GLM 4.5 Air's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Hy3 preview's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next