Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 4.5 Air vs Nemotron 3 Super

Nemotron 3 Super leads GLM 4.5 Air on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 12.8 to 11.1, and Nemotron 3 Super costs 2.4x less per output token ($0.45 vs $1.10 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 34 benchmarks have a result for both.

Replace GLM 4.5 Air Replace Nemotron 3 Super
GLM 4.5 AirZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.10
15
Nemotron 3 SuperNVIDIA
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.45
19
vs boards won of 34 shared

GLM 4.5 Air or Nemotron 3 Super: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GLM 4.5 Air for work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Model AGLM 4.5 AirZ.aiNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BNemotron 3 SuperNVIDIANot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved task
Shared results
34
GLM 4.5 Air only
15
Nemotron 3 Super only
5
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 4.5 Air not benchmarked, Nemotron 3 Super not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 21.3 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
IFBench: GLM 4.5 Air 37.6% against Nemotron 3 Super 71.5%, 33.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GLM 4.5 Air $1.10 against Nemotron 3 Super $0.45 per million output tokens, 2.4x apart.
Context window
GLM 4.5 Air takes 131K tokens, Nemotron 3 Super 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGLM 4.5 AirBarsNemotron 3 SuperTies
Coding03
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning05
Math12
Knowledge31
General116
All shared boards1519
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirNemotron 3 SuperLeader
AA Coding IndexNot measured37.7Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)68.4%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
SciCodeNot measured36.2%Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)20.5%28.8%Nemotron 3 Super
GSO-Bench2.9%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
WeirdMLNot measured38.0%Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
ALE-BenchNot measured213.9Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: coding13971403Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: software and IT14011409Nemotron 3 Super
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirNemotron 3 SuperLeader
AA Intelligence Index11.112.8Nemotron 3 Super
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirNemotron 3 SuperLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured1.7Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
τ²-Bench Telecom46.5%67.8%Nemotron 3 Super
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirNemotron 3 SuperLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)73.3%80.0%Nemotron 3 Super
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)7.0%20.8%Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: hard prompts13791386Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: expert13701398Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13881397Nemotron 3 Super
Kagi LLM Benchmark43.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12
Math benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirNemotron 3 SuperLeader
AA Math Index80.7Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)80.7%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: math13961380GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: mathematical work13961405Nemotron 3 Super
MathArena12.0%16.6%Nemotron 3 Super
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index31
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirNemotron 3 SuperLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)81.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: science14071387GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14021383GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: legal and government13821392Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: business and finance13711364GLM 4.5 Air
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirNemotron 3 SuperLeader
Design Arena: websites1146Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Design Arena: UI components1121Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Design Arena: game dev1093Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Design Arena: data viz1186Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Design Arena: 3D1122Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Design Arena: all code categories1137Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Design Arena: SVG1070Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index116
General benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirNemotron 3 SuperLeader
IFBench37.6%71.5%Nemotron 3 Super
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)46.7%65.7%Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text13841378GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: instruction following13541347GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: creative writing13431317GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: English13971400Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: non-English13661356GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: Chinese14261431Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: German13771341GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: Japanese1348Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: Korean1308Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: French14001403Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: Spanish13851418Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: Russian13731336GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: Polish13681346GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: multi-turn13711369GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: longer queries13661362GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: writing and language13541332GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13391336GLM 4.5 Air
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirNemotron 3 SuperLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 4.5 Air$0.0008Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Super$0.0003Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Super costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 4.5 Air$0.013Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Super$0.0056Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Super costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 4.5 Air$0.051Exceeds the context window
Nemotron 3 Super$0.021Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Super costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 4.5 Air and Nemotron 3 Super
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 4.5 AirNVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super
MakerZ.aiNVIDIA
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 25, 2025March 11, 2026
Context window131K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.20$0.085
Output $/Mtok$1.10$0.45
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 4.5 Air better than Nemotron 3 Super for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 4.5 Air for work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GLM 4.5 Air or Nemotron 3 Super?

GLM 4.5 Air costs $0.20 per million input tokens and $1.10 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3 Super costs $0.085 and $0.45. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 4.5 Air or Nemotron 3 Super?

Nemotron 3 Super, with 262K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the GLM 4.5 Air vs Nemotron 3 Super comparison based on?

34 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GLM 4.5 Air's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Nemotron 3 Super's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next