Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 4.5 Air vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B

Mistral Small 3.1 24B costs 2.0x less per output token than GLM 4.5 Air ($0.555 vs $1.10 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 28 benchmarks have a result for both.

GLM 4.5 AirZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.10
28
Mistral Small 3.1 24BMistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.555
0
vs boards won of 28 shared

GLM 4.5 Air or Mistral Small 3.1 24B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GLM 4.5 Air for a larger context window (131K against 128K tokens).

Shared results
28
GLM 4.5 Air only
20
Mistral Small 3.1 24B only
10
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 4.5 Air not benchmarked, Mistral Small 3.1 24B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 21.6 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: Chinese: GLM 4.5 Air 1426 against Mistral Small 3.1 24B 1253, 29.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GLM 4.5 Air $1.10 against Mistral Small 3.1 24B $0.555 per million output tokens, 2.0x apart.
Context window
GLM 4.5 Air takes 131K tokens, Mistral Small 3.1 24B 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGLM 4.5 AirBarsMistral Small 3.1 24BTies
Coding20
Reasoning30
Math20
Knowledge40
General170
All shared boards280
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirMistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)68.4%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)20.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
GSO-Bench2.9%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: coding13971309GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: software and IT14011301GLM 4.5 Air
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirMistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
AA Intelligence Index11.1Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirMistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom46.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirMistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)73.3%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)7.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13791278GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: expert13701257GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13881290GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1119Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1158Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark43.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirMistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
AA Math Index80.7Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)80.7%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: math13961261GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: mathematical work13961271GLM 4.5 Air
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirMistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)81.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: science14071265GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14021267GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: legal and government13821271GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: business and finance13711257GLM 4.5 Air
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirMistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
Design Arena: websites1146Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Design Arena: UI components1120Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Design Arena: game dev1094Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Design Arena: data viz1186Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Design Arena: 3D1122Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Design Arena: all code categories1137Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Design Arena: SVG1071Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index170
General benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirMistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
IFBench37.6%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)46.7%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text13841277GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: instruction following13541263GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: creative writing13431252GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena VisionNot measured1136Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: English13971295GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: non-English13661255GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: Chinese14261253GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: German13771266GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: Japanese13481208GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: Korean13081207GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: French14001273GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: Spanish13851284GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: Russian13731263GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: Polish13681242GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: multi-turn13711270GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: longer queries13661299GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: writing and language13541268GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13391250GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1157Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1155Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1132Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1142Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1153Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1155Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1123Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirMistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 4.5 Air$0.0008Fits in one request
Mistral Small 3.1 24B$0.0006Fits in one request

Mistral Small 3.1 24B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 4.5 Air$0.013Fits in one request
Mistral Small 3.1 24B$0.019Fits in one request

GLM 4.5 Air costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 4.5 Air$0.051Exceeds the context window
Mistral Small 3.1 24B$0.076Exceeds the context window

GLM 4.5 Air costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 4.5 Air and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 4.5 AirMistral Small 3.1 24B
MakerZ.aiMistral AI
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 25, 2025March 17, 2025
Context window131K128K
Input $/Mtok$0.20$0.351
Output $/Mtok$1.10$0.555
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 4.5 Air better than Mistral Small 3.1 24B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 4.5 Air for a larger context window (131K against 128K tokens).

Which is cheaper, GLM 4.5 Air or Mistral Small 3.1 24B?

GLM 4.5 Air costs $0.20 per million input tokens and $1.10 per million output tokens; Mistral Small 3.1 24B costs $0.351 and $0.555. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 4.5 Air or Mistral Small 3.1 24B?

GLM 4.5 Air, with 131K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GLM 4.5 Air vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B comparison based on?

28 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GLM 4.5 Air's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Mistral Small 3.1 24B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next