Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 4.5 Air vs Ministral 3 14B 2512

GLM 4.5 Air leads Ministral 3 14B 2512 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 11.1 to 6.0, and Ministral 3 14B 2512 costs 5.5x less per output token ($0.20 vs $1.10 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 5 benchmarks have a result for both.

GLM 4.5 AirZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.10
5
Ministral 3 14B 2512Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.20
0
vs boards won of 5 shared

GLM 4.5 Air or Ministral 3 14B 2512: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
5
GLM 4.5 Air only
44
Ministral 3 14B 2512 only
2
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 4.5 Air not benchmarked, Ministral 3 14B 2512 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Web design, 10.2 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: 3D: GLM 4.5 Air 1123 against Ministral 3 14B 2512 991, 16.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GLM 4.5 Air $1.10 against Ministral 3 14B 2512 $0.20 per million output tokens, 5.5x apart.
Context window
GLM 4.5 Air takes 131K tokens, Ministral 3 14B 2512 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGLM 4.5 AirBarsMinistral 3 14B 2512Ties
Intelligence10
Web design40
All shared boards50
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index6 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Ministral 3 14B 2512
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirMinistral 3 14B 2512Leader
AA Coding IndexNot measured14.4Only Ministral 3 14B 2512 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)68.4%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)20.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
GSO-Bench2.9%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: coding1397Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1401Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Ministral 3 14B 2512
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirMinistral 3 14B 2512Leader
AA Intelligence Index11.16.0GLM 4.5 Air
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Ministral 3 14B 2512
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirMinistral 3 14B 2512Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured1.1Only Ministral 3 14B 2512 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom46.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Ministral 3 14B 2512
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirMinistral 3 14B 2512Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)73.3%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)7.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1379Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: expert1370Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1388Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark43.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Ministral 3 14B 2512
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirMinistral 3 14B 2512Leader
AA Math Index80.7Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)80.7%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: math1396Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1396Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
MathArena12.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Ministral 3 14B 2512
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirMinistral 3 14B 2512Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)81.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: science1407Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1401Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1382Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1370Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Web design benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Ministral 3 14B 2512
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirMinistral 3 14B 2512Leader
Design Arena: websites11461081GLM 4.5 Air
Design Arena: UI components1121Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Design Arena: game dev10941037GLM 4.5 Air
Design Arena: data viz1187Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Design Arena: 3D1123991GLM 4.5 Air
Design Arena: all code categories11371064GLM 4.5 Air
Design Arena: SVG1071Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index19 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Ministral 3 14B 2512
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirMinistral 3 14B 2512Leader
IFBench37.6%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)46.7%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text1384Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1354Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1343Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: English1397Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: non-English1366Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1426Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: German1377Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1348Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: Korean1308Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: French1399Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1386Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: Russian1373Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: Polish1368Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1371Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1366Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1354Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1340Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Ministral 3 14B 2512
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirMinistral 3 14B 2512Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 4.5 Air$0.0008Fits in one request
Ministral 3 14B 2512$0.0003Fits in one request

Ministral 3 14B 2512 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 4.5 Air$0.013Fits in one request
Ministral 3 14B 2512$0.011Fits in one request

Ministral 3 14B 2512 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 4.5 Air$0.051Exceeds the context window
Ministral 3 14B 2512$0.042Fits in one request

Ministral 3 14B 2512 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 4.5 Air and Ministral 3 14B 2512
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 4.5 AirMistral Ministral 3 14B 2512
MakerZ.aiMistral AI
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 25, 2025December 2, 2025
Context window131K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.20$0.20
Output $/Mtok$1.10$0.20
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 4.5 Air better than Ministral 3 14B 2512 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, GLM 4.5 Air or Ministral 3 14B 2512?

GLM 4.5 Air costs $0.20 per million input tokens and $1.10 per million output tokens; Ministral 3 14B 2512 costs $0.20 and $0.20. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 4.5 Air or Ministral 3 14B 2512?

Ministral 3 14B 2512, with 262K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the GLM 4.5 Air vs Ministral 3 14B 2512 comparison based on?

5 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. GLM 4.5 Air's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Ministral 3 14B 2512's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next