Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 4.5 Air vs Mercury 3

Mercury 3 costs 3.1x less per output token than GLM 4.5 Air ($0.35 vs $1.10 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 5 benchmarks have a result for both.

GLM 4.5 AirZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.10
0
Mercury 3Inception
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.35
5
vs boards won of 5 shared

GLM 4.5 Air or Mercury 3: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GLM 4.5 Air for work measured by Design Arena: websites or Design Arena: UI components, where it leads.

Shared results
5
GLM 4.5 Air only
43
Mercury 3 only
0
Like-for-like categories
1 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 4.5 Air not benchmarked, Mercury 3 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Web design, 11.7 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: UI components: GLM 4.5 Air 1120 against Mercury 3 1255, 16.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GLM 4.5 Air $1.10 against Mercury 3 $0.35 per million output tokens, 3.1x apart.
Context window
GLM 4.5 Air takes 131K tokens, Mercury 3 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGLM 4.5 AirBarsMercury 3Ties
Web design05
All shared boards05
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index5 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Mercury 3
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirMercury 3Leader
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)68.4%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)20.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
GSO-Bench2.9%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: coding1397Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1401Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Mercury 3
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirMercury 3Leader
AA Intelligence Index11.1Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Mercury 3
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirMercury 3Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom46.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Mercury 3
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirMercury 3Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)73.3%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)7.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1379Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: expert1370Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1388Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark43.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Mercury 3
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirMercury 3Leader
AA Math Index80.7Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)80.7%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: math1396Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1396Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Mercury 3
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirMercury 3Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)81.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: science1407Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1402Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1382Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1371Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Web design benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Mercury 3
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirMercury 3Leader
Design Arena: websites11461242Mercury 3
Design Arena: UI components11201255Mercury 3
Design Arena: game dev10941225Mercury 3
Design Arena: data viz11861192Mercury 3
Design Arena: 3D1122Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Design Arena: all code categories11371237Mercury 3
Design Arena: SVG1071Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index19 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Mercury 3
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirMercury 3Leader
IFBench37.6%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)46.7%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text1384Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1354Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1343Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: English1397Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: non-English1366Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1426Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: German1377Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1348Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: Korean1308Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: French1400Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1385Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: Russian1373Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: Polish1368Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1371Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1366Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1354Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1339Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Mercury 3
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirMercury 3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 4.5 Air$0.0008Fits in one request
Mercury 3$0.0003Fits in one request

Mercury 3 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 4.5 Air$0.013Fits in one request
Mercury 3$0.0060Fits in one request

Mercury 3 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 4.5 Air$0.051Exceeds the context window
Mercury 3$0.024Fits in one request

Mercury 3 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 4.5 Air and Mercury 3
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 4.5 AirInception Mercury 3
MakerZ.aiInception
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedJuly 25, 2025October 16, 2026
Context window131K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.20$0.10
Output $/Mtok$1.10$0.35
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 4.5 Air better than Mercury 3 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 4.5 Air for work measured by Design Arena: websites or Design Arena: UI components, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GLM 4.5 Air or Mercury 3?

GLM 4.5 Air costs $0.20 per million input tokens and $1.10 per million output tokens; Mercury 3 costs $0.10 and $0.35. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 4.5 Air or Mercury 3?

Mercury 3, with 1M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the GLM 4.5 Air vs Mercury 3 comparison based on?

5 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GLM 4.5 Air's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Mercury 3's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next