Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 4.5 Air vs Grok Build 0.1

Grok Build 0.1 leads GLM 4.5 Air on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 27.2 to 11.1, and GLM 4.5 Air costs 1.8x less per output token ($1.10 vs $2.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 1 benchmarks have a result for both.

GLM 4.5 AirZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.10
0
Grok Build 0.1xAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.00
1
vs boards won of 1 shared

GLM 4.5 Air or Grok Build 0.1: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GLM 4.5 Air for output tokens 1.8x cheaper ($1.10 vs $2.00 per million) and work measured by AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Shared results
1
GLM 4.5 Air only
47
Grok Build 0.1 only
2
Like-for-like categories
1 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 4.5 Air not benchmarked, Grok Build 0.1 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Intelligence, 16.1 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Intelligence Index: GLM 4.5 Air 11.1 against Grok Build 0.1 27.2, 16.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GLM 4.5 Air $1.10 against Grok Build 0.1 $2.00 per million output tokens, 1.8x apart.
Context window
GLM 4.5 Air takes 131K tokens, Grok Build 0.1 256K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGLM 4.5 AirBarsGrok Build 0.1Ties
Intelligence01
All shared boards01
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index7 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Grok Build 0.1
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirGrok Build 0.1Leader
AA Coding IndexNot measured51.5Only Grok Build 0.1 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured13.4%Only Grok Build 0.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)68.4%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)20.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
GSO-Bench2.9%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: coding1397Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1401Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Grok Build 0.1
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirGrok Build 0.1Leader
AA Intelligence Index11.127.2Grok Build 0.1
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Grok Build 0.1
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirGrok Build 0.1Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom46.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Grok Build 0.1
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirGrok Build 0.1Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)73.3%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)7.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1379Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: expert1370Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1388Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark43.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Grok Build 0.1
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirGrok Build 0.1Leader
AA Math Index80.7Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)80.7%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: math1396Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1396Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Grok Build 0.1
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirGrok Build 0.1Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)81.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: science1407Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1402Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1382Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1371Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Grok Build 0.1
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirGrok Build 0.1Leader
Design Arena: websites1146Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Design Arena: UI components1120Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Design Arena: game dev1094Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Design Arena: data viz1186Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Design Arena: 3D1122Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Design Arena: all code categories1137Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Design Arena: SVG1071Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index19 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Grok Build 0.1
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirGrok Build 0.1Leader
IFBench37.6%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)46.7%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text1384Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1354Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1343Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: English1397Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: non-English1366Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1426Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: German1377Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1348Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: Korean1308Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: French1400Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1385Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: Russian1373Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: Polish1368Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1371Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1366Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1354Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1339Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Grok Build 0.1
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirGrok Build 0.1Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 4.5 Air$0.0008Fits in one request
Grok Build 0.1$0.0020Fits in one request

GLM 4.5 Air costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 4.5 Air$0.013Fits in one request
Grok Build 0.1$0.056Fits in one request

GLM 4.5 Air costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 4.5 Air$0.051Exceeds the context window
Grok Build 0.1$0.220Fits in one request

GLM 4.5 Air costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 4.5 Air and Grok Build 0.1
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 4.5 AirSpaceXAI Grok Build 0.1
MakerZ.aixAI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedJuly 25, 2025May 20, 2026
Context window131K256K
Input $/Mtok$0.20$1.00
Output $/Mtok$1.10$2.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 4.5 Air better than Grok Build 0.1 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 4.5 Air for output tokens 1.8x cheaper ($1.10 vs $2.00 per million) and work measured by AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GLM 4.5 Air or Grok Build 0.1?

GLM 4.5 Air costs $0.20 per million input tokens and $1.10 per million output tokens; Grok Build 0.1 costs $1.00 and $2.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 4.5 Air or Grok Build 0.1?

Grok Build 0.1, with 256K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the GLM 4.5 Air vs Grok Build 0.1 comparison based on?

1 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GLM 4.5 Air's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Grok Build 0.1's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next