Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 4.5 Air vs GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)

GLM 4.5 Air costs 1.8x less per output token than GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) ($1.10 vs $2.00 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

GLM 4.5 AirZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.10
GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.00
vs $1.10 vs $2.00 per 1M output tokens. GLM 4.5 Air is 1.8x cheaper.

GLM 4.5 Air or GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613): which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GLM 4.5 Air for output tokens 1.8x cheaper ($1.10 vs $2.00 per million) and a larger context window (131K against 4K tokens).

No benchmark has tested both yet. GLM 4.5 Air has results on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) and GSO-Bench; GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) on GSM8K, MMLU and WinoGrande. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 4.5 Air not benchmarked, GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
GLM 4.5 Air $1.10 against GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) $2.00 per million output tokens, 1.8x apart.
Context window
GLM 4.5 Air takes 131K tokens, GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) 4K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index5 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)Leader
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)68.4%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)20.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
GSO-Bench2.9%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: coding1397Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1401Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)Leader
AA Intelligence Index11.1Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom46.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 41 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)73.3%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)7.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1379Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: expert1370Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1388Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark43.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Math benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)Leader
AA Math Index80.7Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)80.7%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
GSM8KNot measured46.9%Only GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) measured
LMArena Text: math1396Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1396Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
MathArena12.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)81.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
MMLUNot measured68.9%Only GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) measured
LMArena Text: science1407Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1401Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1382Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1370Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)Leader
Design Arena: websites1146Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Design Arena: UI components1121Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Design Arena: game dev1094Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Design Arena: data viz1187Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Design Arena: 3D1123Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Design Arena: all code categories1137Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Design Arena: SVG1071Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20 boards measured
General benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)Leader
IFBench37.6%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)46.7%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
WinoGrandeNot measured81.6%Only GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) measured
LMArena Text1384Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1354Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1343Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: English1397Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: non-English1366Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1426Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: German1377Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1348Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: Korean1308Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: French1399Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1386Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: Russian1373Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: Polish1368Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1371Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1366Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1354Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1340Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 4.5 Air$0.0008Fits in one request
GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)$0.0020Fits in one request

GLM 4.5 Air costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 4.5 Air$0.013Fits in one request
GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)$0.056Exceeds the context window

GLM 4.5 Air costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 4.5 Air$0.051Exceeds the context window
GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)$0.220Exceeds the context window

GLM 4.5 Air costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 4.5 Air and GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 4.5 AirOpenAI GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
MakerZ.aiOpenAI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedJuly 25, 2025January 25, 2024
Context window131K4K
Input $/Mtok$0.20$1.00
Output $/Mtok$1.10$2.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 4.5 Air better than GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 4.5 Air for output tokens 1.8x cheaper ($1.10 vs $2.00 per million) and a larger context window (131K against 4K tokens).

Which is cheaper, GLM 4.5 Air or GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)?

GLM 4.5 Air costs $0.20 per million input tokens and $1.10 per million output tokens; GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) costs $1.00 and $2.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 4.5 Air or GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)?

GLM 4.5 Air, with 131K tokens against 4K.

Has any benchmark tested both GLM 4.5 Air and GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)?

No benchmark has tested both yet. GLM 4.5 Air has results on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) and GSO-Bench; GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) on GSM8K, MMLU and WinoGrande. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 23, 2026.

Compare next