Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) vs Moondream 3.1

Moondream 3.1 costs 4.8x less per output token than Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) ($2.50 vs $12.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)Google
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$12.00
M Moondream 3.1Moondream
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.50
vs $12.00 vs $2.50 per 1M output tokens. Moondream 3.1 is 4.8x cheaper.

Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) or Moondream 3.1: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) for a larger context window (131K against 32K tokens).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) has results on LMArena Image Edit; Moondream 3.1 has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) not benchmarked, Moondream 3.1 not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) $12.00 against Moondream 3.1 $2.50 per million output tokens, 4.8x apart.
Context window
Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) takes 131K tokens, Moondream 3.1 32K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

Image generationDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Image generation benchmarks for Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) and Moondream 3.1
BenchmarkNano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)Moondream 3.1Leader
LMArena Image Edit1390Not measuredOnly Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)$0.0080Fits in one request
Moondream 3.1$0.0015Fits in one request

Moondream 3.1 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)$0.136Fits in one request
Moondream 3.1$0.022Exceeds the context window

Moondream 3.1 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)$0.520Exceeds the context window
Moondream 3.1$0.085Exceeds the context window

Moondream 3.1 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) and Moondream 3.1
SpecificationGoogle Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)Moondream 3.1
MakerGoogleMoondream
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJune 18, 2026October 15, 2026
Context window131K32K
Input $/Mtok$2.00$0.30
Output $/Mtok$12.00$2.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) better than Moondream 3.1 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) for a larger context window (131K against 32K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) or Moondream 3.1?

Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $12.00 per million output tokens; Moondream 3.1 costs $0.30 and $2.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) or Moondream 3.1?

Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image), with 131K tokens against 32K.

Has any benchmark tested both Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) and Moondream 3.1?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) has results on LMArena Image Edit; Moondream 3.1 has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next