Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) vs GPT Audio

Updated October 21, 2026. 0 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)Google
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$12.00
GPT AudioOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$10.00
vs $12.00 vs $10.00 per 1M output tokens. GPT Audio is 1.2x cheaper.

Decision reading

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) has the edge where the context window is larger, 131K against 128K tokens.

Shared results
0
Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) only
1
GPT Audio only
0
Like-for-like categories
0 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) not benchmarked, GPT Audio not benchmarked.
Widest category
No category has a result for both models.
Widest single gap
No benchmark has a result for both models.
Output price
Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) $12.00 against GPT Audio $10.00 per million output tokens, 1.2x apart.
Context window
Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) takes 131K tokens, GPT Audio 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

CodingNot comparableSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index0 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) and GPT Audio
BenchmarkNano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)GPT AudioLeader
Neither model has a result on 38 boards here
IntelligenceNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) and GPT Audio
BenchmarkNano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)GPT AudioLeader
Neither model has a result on 2 boards here
Agentic workNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) and GPT Audio
BenchmarkNano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)GPT AudioLeader
Neither model has a result on 39 boards here
ReasoningNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) and GPT Audio
BenchmarkNano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)GPT AudioLeader
Neither model has a result on 21 boards here
MathNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) and GPT Audio
BenchmarkNano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)GPT AudioLeader
Neither model has a result on 13 boards here
KnowledgeNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) and GPT Audio
BenchmarkNano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)GPT AudioLeader
Neither model has a result on 17 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) and GPT Audio
BenchmarkNano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)GPT AudioLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) and GPT Audio
BenchmarkNano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)GPT AudioLeader
Neither model has a result on 46 boards here
Image generationDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) and GPT Audio
BenchmarkNano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)GPT AudioLeader
LMArena Image Edit1390Not measuredOnly Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)$0.0080Fits in one request
GPT Audio$0.0075Fits in one request

GPT Audio costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)$0.136Fits in one request
GPT Audio$0.155Fits in one request

Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)$0.520Exceeds the context window
GPT Audio$0.600Exceeds the context window

Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) and GPT Audio
SpecificationGoogle Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)OpenAI GPT Audio
MakerGoogleOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedJune 18, 2026January 19, 2026
Context window131K128K
Input $/Mtok$2.00$2.50
Output $/Mtok$12.00$10.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) better than GPT Audio for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) has the edge where the context window is larger, 131K against 128K tokens.

Which is cheaper, Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) or GPT Audio?

Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $12.00 per million output tokens; GPT Audio costs $2.50 and $10.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) or GPT Audio?

Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image), with 131K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) vs GPT Audio comparison based on?

0 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)'s coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and GPT Audio's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next