Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) vs GPT Audio Mini

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) costs 1.6x less per output token than GPT Audio Mini ($1.50 vs $2.40 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)Google
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.50
GPT Audio MiniOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.40
vs $1.50 vs $2.40 per 1M output tokens. Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) is 1.6x cheaper.

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) or GPT Audio Mini: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) for output tokens 1.6x cheaper ($1.50 vs $2.40 per million).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) has results on Design Arena: images, Design Arena: graphic design and Design Arena: logos; GPT Audio Mini has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) not benchmarked, GPT Audio Mini not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) $1.50 against GPT Audio Mini $2.40 per million output tokens, 1.6x apart.
Context window
Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) takes 66K tokens, GPT Audio Mini 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

Image generationDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Image generation benchmarks for Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) and GPT Audio Mini
BenchmarkNano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)GPT Audio MiniLeader
Design Arena: images1239Not measuredOnly Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) measured
Design Arena: graphic design1249Not measuredOnly Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) measured
Design Arena: logos1214Not measuredOnly Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) measured
LMArena Text to Image1250Not measuredOnly Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) measured
LMArena Image Edit1313Not measuredOnly Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) measured

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)$0.0010Fits in one request
GPT Audio Mini$0.0018Fits in one request

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)$0.017Fits in one request
GPT Audio Mini$0.037Fits in one request

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)$0.065Exceeds the context window
GPT Audio Mini$0.144Exceeds the context window

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) and GPT Audio Mini
SpecificationGoogle Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)OpenAI GPT Audio Mini
MakerGoogleOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedJune 30, 2026January 19, 2026
Context window66K128K
Input $/Mtok$0.25$0.60
Output $/Mtok$1.50$2.40
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) better than GPT Audio Mini for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) for output tokens 1.6x cheaper ($1.50 vs $2.40 per million).

Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) or GPT Audio Mini?

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; GPT Audio Mini costs $0.60 and $2.40. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) or GPT Audio Mini?

GPT Audio Mini, with 128K tokens against 66K.

Has any benchmark tested both Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) and GPT Audio Mini?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) has results on Design Arena: images, Design Arena: graphic design and Design Arena: logos; GPT Audio Mini has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next