Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) vs GLM 4.7 Flash

GLM 4.7 Flash costs 3.8x less per output token than Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) ($0.40 vs $1.50 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)Google
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.50
GLM 4.7 FlashZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
42.1
Output $/M
$0.40
vs $1.50 vs $0.40 per 1M output tokens. GLM 4.7 Flash is 3.8x cheaper.

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) or GLM 4.7 Flash: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

No benchmark has tested both yet. Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) has results on Design Arena: images, Design Arena: graphic design and Design Arena: logos; GLM 4.7 Flash on Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), LMArena Text: coding and LMArena Text: software and IT. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) not benchmarked, GLM 4.7 Flash not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) $1.50 against GLM 4.7 Flash $0.40 per million output tokens, 3.8x apart.
Context window
Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) takes 66K tokens, GLM 4.7 Flash 200K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index3 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) and GLM 4.7 Flash
BenchmarkNano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)GLM 4.7 FlashLeader
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured22.0%Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1382Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1389Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) and GLM 4.7 Flash
BenchmarkNano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)GLM 4.7 FlashLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured14.9Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) and GLM 4.7 Flash
BenchmarkNano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)GLM 4.7 FlashLeader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured98.8%Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) and GLM 4.7 Flash
BenchmarkNano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)GLM 4.7 FlashLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured58.1%Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured7.6%Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured60.5%Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1356Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1357Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1369Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) and GLM 4.7 Flash
BenchmarkNano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)GLM 4.7 FlashLeader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured58.3%Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1355Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1369Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) and GLM 4.7 Flash
BenchmarkNano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)GLM 4.7 FlashLeader
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1358Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1343Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1357Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1343Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) and GLM 4.7 Flash
BenchmarkNano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)GLM 4.7 FlashLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1194Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1208Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1135Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1123Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1121Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1178Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1038Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index18 boards measured
General benchmarks for Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) and GLM 4.7 Flash
BenchmarkNano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)GLM 4.7 FlashLeader
IFBenchNot measured60.8%Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured41.7%Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena TextNot measured1351Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1327Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1296Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1373Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1330Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1403Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1336Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1283Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1332Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1350Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1333Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1291Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1342Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1345Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1320Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1304Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
Image generationDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Image generation benchmarks for Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) and GLM 4.7 Flash
BenchmarkNano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)GLM 4.7 FlashLeader
Design Arena: images1239Not measuredOnly Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) measured
Design Arena: graphic design1249Not measuredOnly Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) measured
Design Arena: logos1214Not measuredOnly Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) measured
LMArena Text to Image1250Not measuredOnly Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) measured
LMArena Image Edit1313Not measuredOnly Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) measured

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)$0.0010Fits in one request
GLM 4.7 Flash$0.0003Fits in one request

GLM 4.7 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)$0.017Fits in one request
GLM 4.7 Flash$0.0045Fits in one request

GLM 4.7 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)$0.065Exceeds the context window
GLM 4.7 Flash$0.017Exceeds the context window

GLM 4.7 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) and GLM 4.7 Flash
SpecificationGoogle Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)Z.ai GLM 4.7 Flash
MakerGoogleZ.ai
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJune 30, 2026January 19, 2026
Context window66K200K
Input $/Mtok$0.25$0.0653
Output $/Mtok$1.50$0.40
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) better than GLM 4.7 Flash for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) or GLM 4.7 Flash?

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; GLM 4.7 Flash costs $0.0653 and $0.40. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) or GLM 4.7 Flash?

GLM 4.7 Flash, with 200K tokens against 66K.

Has any benchmark tested both Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) and GLM 4.7 Flash?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) has results on Design Arena: images, Design Arena: graphic design and Design Arena: logos; GLM 4.7 Flash on Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), LMArena Text: coding and LMArena Text: software and IT. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next