Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) vs Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 costs 3.5x less per output token than Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) ($0.85 vs $3.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Replace Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) Replace Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Google

Coding: No data
Overall: No data
Output $/M: $3.00

S Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2Sao10K

Coding: No data
Overall: No data
Output $/M: $0.85

vs $3.00 vs $0.85 per 1M output tokens. Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 is 3.5x cheaper.

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) or Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Model ANano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)GoogleNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved task Model BLlama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2Sao10KNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved task

No benchmark has tested both yet. Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) has results on LMArena Image Edit; Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Long documents
Listed context window
No call
Both take 131K tokens.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) $0.0020, Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 $0.0013 per turn.
List prices

At a glance

Coding index: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) not benchmarked, Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 not benchmarked.
Widest category: None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap: None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) $3.00 against Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 $0.85 per million output tokens, 3.5x apart.
Context window: Both take 131K tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

Image generationDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured

Image generation benchmarks for Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) and Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2
Benchmark	Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)	Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2	Leader
LMArena Image Edit	1387	Not measured	Only Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)$0.0020Fits in one request

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2$0.0013Fits in one request

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)$0.034Fits in one request

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2$0.045Fits in one request

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)$0.130Exceeds the context window

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2$0.178Exceeds the context window

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) and Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2
Specification	Google Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)	Sao10K Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2
Maker	Google	Sao10K
Weights	No public weights listed	Open weights
Released	June 18, 2026	August 28, 2024
Context window	131K	131K
Input $/Mtok	$0.50	$0.85
Output $/Mtok	$3.00	$0.85
Coding index	Not benchmarked	Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it	0	0
Cost per solved task	Not computable	Not computable
Source	OpenRouter listing	OpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) better than Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) or Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2?

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) costs $0.50 per million input tokens and $3.00 per million output tokens; Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 costs $0.85 and $0.85. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) or Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2?

Neither: both take 131K tokens.

Has any benchmark tested both Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) and Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) has results on LMArena Image Edit; Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.