Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) vs Relace Search

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) and Relace Search cost about the same per output token ($3.00 vs $3.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Google
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$3.00
Relace SearchRelace
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$3.00
vs $3.00 vs $3.00 per 1M output tokens. About the same price.

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) or Relace Search: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

No benchmark has tested both yet. Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) has results on LMArena Image Edit; Relace Search has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) not benchmarked, Relace Search not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Both cost $3.00 per million output tokens.
Context window
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) takes 131K tokens, Relace Search 256K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

Image generationDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Image generation benchmarks for Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) and Relace Search
BenchmarkNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Relace SearchLeader
LMArena Image Edit1387Not measuredOnly Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)$0.0020Fits in one request
Relace Search$0.0025Fits in one request

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)$0.034Fits in one request
Relace Search$0.059Fits in one request

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)$0.130Exceeds the context window
Relace Search$0.230Fits in one request

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) and Relace Search
SpecificationGoogle Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Relace Search
MakerGoogleRelace
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedJune 18, 2026December 8, 2025
Context window131K256K
Input $/Mtok$0.50$1.00
Output $/Mtok$3.00$3.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) better than Relace Search for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) or Relace Search?

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) costs $0.50 per million input tokens and $3.00 per million output tokens; Relace Search costs $1.00 and $3.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) or Relace Search?

Relace Search, with 256K tokens against 131K.

Has any benchmark tested both Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) and Relace Search?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) has results on LMArena Image Edit; Relace Search has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next