Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) vs Perceptron Mk1
Perceptron Mk1 costs 2.0x less per output token than Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) ($1.50 vs $3.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $3.00
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $1.50
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) or Perceptron Mk1: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) for a larger context window (131K against 33K tokens).
No benchmark has tested both yet. Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) has results on LMArena Image Edit; Perceptron Mk1 has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Long documents
Listed context window
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) takes 131K tokens against 33K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Perceptron Mk1
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) $0.0020, Perceptron Mk1 $0.0009 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) not benchmarked, Perceptron Mk1 not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
- Widest single gap
- None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
- Output price
- Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) $3.00 against Perceptron Mk1 $1.50 per million output tokens, 2.0x apart.
- Context window
- Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) takes 131K tokens, Perceptron Mk1 33K.
Benchmark by benchmark
Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.
Image generationDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
| Benchmark | Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) | Perceptron Mk1 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena Image Edit | 1387 | Not measured | Only Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Perceptron Mk1 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Perceptron Mk1 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Perceptron Mk1 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Google Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) | Perceptron Mk1 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Perceptron | |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | June 18, 2026 | May 12, 2026 |
| Context window | 131K | 33K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.50 | $0.15 |
| Output $/Mtok | $3.00 | $1.50 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) better than Perceptron Mk1 for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) for a larger context window (131K against 33K tokens).
Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) or Perceptron Mk1?
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) costs $0.50 per million input tokens and $3.00 per million output tokens; Perceptron Mk1 costs $0.15 and $1.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) or Perceptron Mk1?
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image), with 131K tokens against 33K.
Has any benchmark tested both Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) and Perceptron Mk1?
No benchmark has tested both yet. Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) has results on LMArena Image Edit; Perceptron Mk1 has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.