Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) vs Mistral Large 2407

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) costs 2.0x less per output token than Mistral Large 2407 ($3.00 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Google
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$3.00
Mistral Large 2407Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$6.00
vs $3.00 vs $6.00 per 1M output tokens. Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) is 2.0x cheaper.

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) or Mistral Large 2407: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) for output tokens 2.0x cheaper ($3.00 vs $6.00 per million).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) has results on LMArena Image Edit; Mistral Large 2407 on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), AA Intelligence Index and τ²-Bench Telecom. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) not benchmarked, Mistral Large 2407 not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) $3.00 against Mistral Large 2407 $6.00 per million output tokens, 2.0x apart.
Context window
Both take 131K tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index1 board measured
Coding benchmarks for Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Mistral Large 2407Leader
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured26.7%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Mistral Large 2407Leader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured7.6Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Mistral Large 2407Leader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured33.0%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Mistral Large 2407Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured47.2%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured2.9%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured49.0%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
SimpleBenchNot measured22.5%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Mistral Large 2407Leader
AA Math IndexNot measured0.0Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured0.0%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured8.5%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
MATH level 5Not measured44.8%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Mistral Large 2407Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured68.3%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
MMLUNot measured80.0%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
General benchmarks for Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Mistral Large 2407Leader
IFBenchNot measured31.6%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured2.0%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
DTBenchNot measured61.2%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured69.0%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 42 boards here
Image generationDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Image generation benchmarks for Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Mistral Large 2407Leader
LMArena Image Edit1387Not measuredOnly Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)$0.0020Fits in one request
Mistral Large 2407$0.0050Fits in one request

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)$0.034Fits in one request
Mistral Large 2407$0.118Fits in one request

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)$0.130Exceeds the context window
Mistral Large 2407$0.460Exceeds the context window

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) and Mistral Large 2407
SpecificationGoogle Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Mistral Large 2407
MakerGoogleMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedJune 18, 2026November 19, 2024
Context window131K131K
Input $/Mtok$0.50$2.00
Output $/Mtok$3.00$6.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) better than Mistral Large 2407 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) for output tokens 2.0x cheaper ($3.00 vs $6.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) or Mistral Large 2407?

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) costs $0.50 per million input tokens and $3.00 per million output tokens; Mistral Large 2407 costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) or Mistral Large 2407?

Neither: both take 131K tokens.

Has any benchmark tested both Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) and Mistral Large 2407?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) has results on LMArena Image Edit; Mistral Large 2407 on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), AA Intelligence Index and τ²-Bench Telecom. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next