Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) vs Qwen-Plus

Qwen-Plus costs 3.8x less per output token than Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) ($0.78 vs $3.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview)Google
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$3.00
Qwen-PlusQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.78
vs $3.00 vs $0.78 per 1M output tokens. Qwen-Plus is 3.8x cheaper.

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) or Qwen-Plus: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

No benchmark has tested both yet. Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) has results on Design Arena: images, Design Arena: graphic design and Design Arena: logos; Qwen-Plus on LMArena Text: coding, LMArena Text: software and IT and GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run). Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) not benchmarked, Qwen-Plus not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) $3.00 against Qwen-Plus $0.78 per million output tokens, 3.8x apart.
Context window
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) takes 66K tokens, Qwen-Plus 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index2 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) and Qwen-Plus
BenchmarkNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview)Qwen-PlusLeader
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1328Only Qwen-Plus measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1343Only Qwen-Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) and Qwen-Plus
BenchmarkNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview)Qwen-PlusLeader
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured48.1%Only Qwen-Plus measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1317Only Qwen-Plus measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1328Only Qwen-Plus measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1333Only Qwen-Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) and Qwen-Plus
BenchmarkNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview)Qwen-PlusLeader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured17.8%Only Qwen-Plus measured
MATH level 5Not measured65.3%Only Qwen-Plus measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1326Only Qwen-Plus measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1332Only Qwen-Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) and Qwen-Plus
BenchmarkNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview)Qwen-PlusLeader
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1352Only Qwen-Plus measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1350Only Qwen-Plus measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1349Only Qwen-Plus measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1303Only Qwen-Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14 boards measured
General benchmarks for Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) and Qwen-Plus
BenchmarkNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview)Qwen-PlusLeader
DTBenchNot measured81.1%Only Qwen-Plus measured
LMCANot measured24.0%Only Qwen-Plus measured
LMArena TextNot measured1326Only Qwen-Plus measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1303Only Qwen-Plus measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1292Only Qwen-Plus measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1339Only Qwen-Plus measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1310Only Qwen-Plus measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1347Only Qwen-Plus measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1251Only Qwen-Plus measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1323Only Qwen-Plus measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1336Only Qwen-Plus measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1324Only Qwen-Plus measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1296Only Qwen-Plus measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1270Only Qwen-Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
Image generationDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
Image generation benchmarks for Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) and Qwen-Plus
BenchmarkNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview)Qwen-PlusLeader
Design Arena: images1269Not measuredOnly Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) measured
Design Arena: graphic design1249Not measuredOnly Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) measured
Design Arena: logos1248Not measuredOnly Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview)$0.0020Fits in one request
Qwen-Plus$0.0006Fits in one request

Qwen-Plus costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview)$0.034Fits in one request
Qwen-Plus$0.015Fits in one request

Qwen-Plus costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview)$0.130Exceeds the context window
Qwen-Plus$0.060Fits in one request

Qwen-Plus costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) and Qwen-Plus
SpecificationGoogle Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview)Qwen-Plus
MakerGoogleQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedFebruary 26, 2026February 1, 2025
Context window66K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.50$0.26
Output $/Mtok$3.00$0.78
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) better than Qwen-Plus for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) or Qwen-Plus?

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) costs $0.50 per million input tokens and $3.00 per million output tokens; Qwen-Plus costs $0.26 and $0.78. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) or Qwen-Plus?

Qwen-Plus, with 1M tokens against 66K.

Has any benchmark tested both Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) and Qwen-Plus?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) has results on Design Arena: images, Design Arena: graphic design and Design Arena: logos; Qwen-Plus on LMArena Text: coding, LMArena Text: software and IT and GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run). Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next