Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs Hy3 preview

Hy3 preview costs 16.7x less per output token than Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 ($0.60 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 2 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Google
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$10.00
0
Hy3 previewTencent
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
2
vs boards won of 2 shared

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 or Hy3 preview: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 for a larger context window (1.05M against 262K tokens) and work measured by GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) or Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
2
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 only
13
Hy3 preview only
34
Like-for-like categories
1 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 not benchmarked, Hy3 preview not benchmarked.
Widest category
Reasoning, 5.5 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run): Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 19.9% against Hy3 preview 27.8%, 7.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 $10.00 against Hy3 preview $0.60 per million output tokens, 16.7x apart.
Context window
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 takes 1.05M tokens, Hy3 preview 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05BarsHy3 previewTies
Reasoning02
All shared boards02
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index12 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Hy3 previewLeader
Aider polyglot83.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1357Only Hy3 preview measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured58.8Only Hy3 preview measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)79.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)77.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured34.1%Only Hy3 preview measured
GSO-Bench3.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1421Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1423Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1349Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1356Only Hy3 preview measured
SciCode7.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Hy3 previewLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured25.3Only Hy3 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Hy3 previewLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured24.1Only Hy3 preview measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured92.7%Only Hy3 preview measured
METR time horizons55.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
Remote Labor Index0.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
DeepResearch Bench42.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Hy3 previewLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)83.6%86.7%Hy3 preview
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)19.9%27.8%Hy3 preview
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)84.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
SimpleBench62.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
VPCT46.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1413Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1422Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1416Only Hy3 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Hy3 previewLeader
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1424Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1442Only Hy3 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Hy3 previewLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)85.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1416Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1405Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1430Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1397Only Hy3 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Hy3 previewLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index16 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Hy3 previewLeader
IFBenchNot measured63.1%Only Hy3 preview measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured64.7%Only Hy3 preview measured
Fiction.LiveBench91.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1401Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1383Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1339Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1409Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1390Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1435Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1425Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1399Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1399Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1411Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1402Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1370Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1352Only Hy3 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Hy3 previewLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05$0.0063Fits in one request
Hy3 preview$0.0005Fits in one request

Hy3 preview costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05$0.092Fits in one request
Hy3 preview$0.011Fits in one request

Hy3 preview costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05$0.350Fits in one request
Hy3 preview$0.042Fits in one request

Hy3 preview costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Hy3 preview
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Tencent Hy3 preview
MakerGoogleTencent
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJune 5, 2025April 22, 2026
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$1.25$0.18
Output $/Mtok$10.00$0.60
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 better than Hy3 preview for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 for a larger context window (1.05M against 262K tokens) and work measured by GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) or Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 or Hy3 preview?

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Hy3 preview costs $0.18 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 or Hy3 preview?

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs Hy3 preview comparison based on?

2 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Hy3 preview's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next