Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs Hy3

Hy3 costs 18.9x less per output token than Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 ($0.528 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 2 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Google
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$10.00
0
Hy3Tencent
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.528
2
vs boards won of 2 shared

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 or Hy3: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 for a larger context window (1.05M against 262K tokens) and work measured by GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) or Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
2
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 only
13
Hy3 only
42
Like-for-like categories
1 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 not benchmarked, Hy3 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Reasoning, 9.9 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run): Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 19.9% against Hy3 33.5%, 13.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 $10.00 against Hy3 $0.528 per million output tokens, 18.9x apart.
Context window
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 takes 1.05M tokens, Hy3 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05BarsHy3Ties
Reasoning02
All shared boards02
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index12 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Hy3
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Hy3Leader
Aider polyglot83.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1507Only Hy3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)79.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)77.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
SciCodeNot measured48.6%Only Hy3 measured
GSO-Bench3.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured838.6Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1466Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1463Only Hy3 measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1511Only Hy3 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1487Only Hy3 measured
SciCode7.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
IntelligenceNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Hy3
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Hy3Leader
Neither model has a result on 2 boards here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Hy3
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Hy3Leader
METR time horizons55.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
Remote Labor Index0.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
DeepResearch Bench42.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Hy3
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Hy3Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)83.6%89.7%Hy3
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)19.9%33.5%Hy3
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)84.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
SimpleBench62.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
VPCT46.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1447Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1461Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1455Only Hy3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Hy3
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Hy3Leader
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1473Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1482Only Hy3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Hy3
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Hy3Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)85.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1457Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1452Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1422Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1424Only Hy3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Hy3
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Hy3Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1230Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1204Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1208Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1164Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1232Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1227Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1200Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1152Only Hy3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index19 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Hy3
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Hy3Leader
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured79.0%Only Hy3 measured
Fiction.LiveBench91.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1438Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1426Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1403Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1448Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1426Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1485Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1449Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1397Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1396Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1456Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1457Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1432Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1447Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1436Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1442Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1414Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1400Only Hy3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Hy3
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Hy3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05$0.0063Fits in one request
Hy3$0.0004Fits in one request

Hy3 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05$0.092Fits in one request
Hy3$0.0082Fits in one request

Hy3 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05$0.350Fits in one request
Hy3$0.032Fits in one request

Hy3 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Hy3
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Tencent Hy3
MakerGoogleTencent
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJune 5, 2025July 6, 2026
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$1.25$0.132
Output $/Mtok$10.00$0.528
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 better than Hy3 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 for a larger context window (1.05M against 262K tokens) and work measured by GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) or Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 or Hy3?

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Hy3 costs $0.132 and $0.528. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 or Hy3?

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs Hy3 comparison based on?

2 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Hy3's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next