Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs 2.9x less per output token than Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 ($3.50 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 2 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Google
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$10.00
2
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen
Coding
No data
Overall
52.9
Output $/M
$3.50
0
vs boards won of 2 shared

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 for a larger context window (1.05M against 128K tokens).

Shared results
2
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 only
13
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 only
44
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 not benchmarked, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 not benchmarked.
Widest category
General, 16.7 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Fiction.LiveBench: Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 91.7% against Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 75.0%, 16.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 $10.00 against Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 $3.50 per million output tokens, 2.9x apart.
Context window
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05BarsQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Ties
Reasoning10
General10
All shared boards20
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index9 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
Aider polyglot83.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured22.1Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)79.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)77.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
GSO-Bench3.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
WeirdMLNot measured41.0%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1424Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1431Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
SciCode7.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured12.7Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured1.3Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
METR time horizons55.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
Remote Labor Index0.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
DeepResearch Bench42.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured-$11Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)83.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)19.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)84.8%80.1%Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
SimpleBench62.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured9.0%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
VPCT46.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1416Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1463Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1432Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured86.7%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1412Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1435Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)85.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured40.4%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1433Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1456Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1415Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1413Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1052Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured942Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured956Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured950Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured997Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1032Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
DTBenchNot measured80.3%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMCANot measured29.3%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Fiction.LiveBench91.7%75.0%Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured82.4%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1415Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1386Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1384Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1429Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1397Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1481Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1408Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1386Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1375Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1389Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1401Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1390Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1406Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1400Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1388Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1370Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05$0.0063Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$0.0022Fits in one request

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05$0.092Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$0.033Fits in one request

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05$0.350Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$0.125Exceeds the context window

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
MakerGoogleQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJune 5, 2025July 25, 2025
Context window1.05M128K
Input $/Mtok$1.25$0.45
Output $/Mtok$10.00$3.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 better than Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 for a larger context window (1.05M against 128K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs $0.45 and $3.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 comparison based on?

2 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next