Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) vs o1-pro
Updated October 21, 2026. 0 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $2.50
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- 12.4
- Output $/M
- $600.00
Decision reading
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) has the edge where output tokens cost 240.0x less.
- Shared results
- 0
- Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) only
- 3
- o1-pro only
- 2
- Like-for-like categories
- 0 of 9
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
No call
Only o1-pro has a AA Intelligence Index result, 12.4.
Directional only
Image generation
Design Arena: images
No call
Only Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) has a Design Arena: images result, 1179.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
o1-pro
o1-pro takes 200K tokens against 33K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) $0.0015, o1-pro $0.450 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) not benchmarked, o1-pro not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- No category has a result for both models.
- Widest single gap
- No benchmark has a result for both models.
- Output price
- Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) $2.50 against o1-pro $600.00 per million output tokens, 240.0x apart.
- Context window
- Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) takes 33K tokens, o1-pro 200K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
CodingNot comparableSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) | o1-pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 38 boards here | |||
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
| Benchmark | Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) | o1-pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | Not measured | 12.4 | Only o1-pro measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
Agentic workNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) | o1-pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 39 boards here | |||
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
| Benchmark | Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) | o1-pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI | Not measured | 23.3% | Only o1-pro measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here | |||
MathNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) | o1-pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 13 boards here | |||
KnowledgeNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) | o1-pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 17 boards here | |||
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) | o1-pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 9 boards here | |||
GeneralNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) | o1-pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 46 boards here | |||
Image generationDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) | o1-pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: images | 1179 | Not measured | Only Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) measured |
| Design Arena: graphic design | 1151 | Not measured | Only Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) measured |
| Design Arena: logos | 1169 | Not measured | Only Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Google Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) | OpenAI o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | OpenAI | |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | October 7, 2025 | March 19, 2025 |
| Context window | 33K | 200K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.30 | $150.00 |
| Output $/Mtok | $2.50 | $600.00 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) better than o1-pro for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) has the edge where output tokens cost 240.0x less.
Which is cheaper, Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) or o1-pro?
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; o1-pro costs $150.00 and $600.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) or o1-pro?
o1-pro, with 200K tokens against 33K.
How many benchmarks is the Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) vs o1-pro comparison based on?
0 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)'s coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and o1-pro's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.