Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) vs Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) costs 4.8x less per output token than Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) ($2.50 vs $12.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)Google
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.50
Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)Google
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$12.00
vs $2.50 vs $12.00 per 1M output tokens. Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) is 4.8x cheaper.

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) or Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image): which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) for output tokens 4.8x cheaper ($2.50 vs $12.00 per million).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) has results on Design Arena: images, Design Arena: graphic design and Design Arena: logos; Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) on LMArena Image Edit. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) not benchmarked, Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) $2.50 against Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) $12.00 per million output tokens, 4.8x apart.
Context window
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) takes 33K tokens, Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

Image generationDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Image generation benchmarks for Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) and Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)
BenchmarkNano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)Leader
Design Arena: images1179Not measuredOnly Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) measured
Design Arena: graphic design1151Not measuredOnly Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) measured
Design Arena: logos1169Not measuredOnly Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) measured
LMArena Image EditNot measured1390Only Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)$0.0015Fits in one request
Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)$0.0080Fits in one request

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)$0.022Exceeds the context window
Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)$0.136Fits in one request

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)$0.085Exceeds the context window
Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)$0.520Exceeds the context window

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) and Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)
SpecificationGoogle Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)Google Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)
MakerGoogleGoogle
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 7, 2025June 18, 2026
Context window33K131K
Input $/Mtok$0.30$2.00
Output $/Mtok$2.50$12.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) better than Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) for output tokens 4.8x cheaper ($2.50 vs $12.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) or Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)?

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) costs $2.00 and $12.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) or Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)?

Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image), with 131K tokens against 33K.

Has any benchmark tested both Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) and Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) has results on Design Arena: images, Design Arena: graphic design and Design Arena: logos; Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) on LMArena Image Edit. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next