Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Devstral 2 2512 vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking leads Devstral 2 2512 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 9.5 to 8.6, and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking costs 2.0x less per output token ($1.00 vs $2.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 1 benchmarks have a result for both.

Replace Devstral 2 2512 Replace Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Devstral 2 2512Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.00
0
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.00
1
vs boards won of 1 shared

Devstral 2 2512 or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Devstral 2 2512 for work measured by AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Model ADevstral 2 2512Mistral AINot benchmarked1 independent benchmark$1.19 per solved taskModel BQwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingQwenNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved task
Shared results
1
Devstral 2 2512 only
5
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking only
0
Like-for-like categories
1 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Devstral 2 2512 not benchmarked, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking not benchmarked.
Widest category
Intelligence, 0.9 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Intelligence Index: Devstral 2 2512 8.6 against Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking 9.5, 0.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Devstral 2 2512 $2.00 against Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking $1.00 per million output tokens, 2.0x apart.
Context window
Both take 262K tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDevstral 2 2512BarsQwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingTies
Intelligence01
All shared boards01
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index4 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512Qwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingLeader
SWE-bench Verified53.8%Not measuredOnly Devstral 2 2512 measured
AA Coding Index31.3Not measuredOnly Devstral 2 2512 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)51.8%Not measuredOnly Devstral 2 2512 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)62.8%Not measuredOnly Devstral 2 2512 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512Qwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingLeader
AA Intelligence Index8.69.5Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512Qwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingLeader
AA Agentic Index2.3Not measuredOnly Devstral 2 2512 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512Qwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingLeader
Neither model has a result on 22 boards here
MathNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512Qwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingLeader
Neither model has a result on 13 boards here
KnowledgeNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512Qwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingLeader
Neither model has a result on 18 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512Qwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512Qwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingLeader
Neither model has a result on 46 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512Qwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Devstral 2 2512$0.0014Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking$0.0008Fits in one request

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Devstral 2 2512$0.026Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking$0.018Fits in one request

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Devstral 2 2512$0.100Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking$0.068Fits in one request

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Devstral 2 2512 and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
SpecificationMistral Devstral 2 2512Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
MakerMistral AIQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedDecember 9, 2025October 6, 2025
Context window262K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.40$0.29
Output $/Mtok$2.00$1.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved task$1.19Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Devstral 2 2512 better than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Devstral 2 2512 for work measured by AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Devstral 2 2512 or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Devstral 2 2512 costs $0.40 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking costs $0.29 and $1.00. Cost per solved task is known for Devstral 2 2512 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Devstral 2 2512 or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Neither: both take 262K tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Devstral 2 2512 vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking comparison based on?

1 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Devstral 2 2512's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next