Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Devstral 2 2512 vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct costs 2.0x less per output token than Devstral 2 2512 ($1.00 vs $2.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Devstral 2 2512Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
8.6
Output $/M
$2.00
Qwen2.5 VL 72B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.00
vs $2.00 vs $1.00 per 1M output tokens. Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is 2.0x cheaper.

Devstral 2 2512 or Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Devstral 2 2512 for a larger context window (262K against 128K tokens).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Devstral 2 2512 has results on SWE-bench Verified, AA Coding Index and LiveCodeBench (Vals AI); Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct on OSWorld, GeoBench and LMArena Vision. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Devstral 2 2512 not benchmarked, Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Devstral 2 2512 $2.00 against Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct $1.00 per million output tokens, 2.0x apart.
Context window
Devstral 2 2512 takes 262K tokens, Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index4 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512Qwen2.5 VL 72B InstructLeader
SWE-bench Verified53.8%Not measuredOnly Devstral 2 2512 measured
AA Coding Index31.3Not measuredOnly Devstral 2 2512 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)51.8%Not measuredOnly Devstral 2 2512 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)62.8%Not measuredOnly Devstral 2 2512 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512Qwen2.5 VL 72B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index8.6Not measuredOnly Devstral 2 2512 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512Qwen2.5 VL 72B InstructLeader
AA Agentic Index2.3Not measuredOnly Devstral 2 2512 measured
OSWorldNot measured5.0%Only Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512Qwen2.5 VL 72B InstructLeader
GeoBenchNot measured62.0%Only Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
General benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512Qwen2.5 VL 72B InstructLeader
LMArena VisionNot measured1107Only Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1115Only Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1107Only Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 43 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Devstral 2 2512$0.0014Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct$0.0013Fits in one request

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Devstral 2 2512$0.026Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct$0.043Fits in one request

Devstral 2 2512 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Devstral 2 2512$0.100Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct$0.170Exceeds the context window

Devstral 2 2512 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Devstral 2 2512 and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
SpecificationMistral Devstral 2 2512Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
MakerMistral AIQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedDecember 9, 2025February 1, 2025
Context window262K128K
Input $/Mtok$0.40$0.80
Output $/Mtok$2.00$1.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved task$1.19Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Devstral 2 2512 better than Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Devstral 2 2512 for a larger context window (262K against 128K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Devstral 2 2512 or Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?

Devstral 2 2512 costs $0.40 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct costs $0.80 and $1.00. Cost per solved task is known for Devstral 2 2512 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Devstral 2 2512 or Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?

Devstral 2 2512, with 262K tokens against 128K.

Has any benchmark tested both Devstral 2 2512 and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Devstral 2 2512 has results on SWE-bench Verified, AA Coding Index and LiveCodeBench (Vals AI); Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct on OSWorld, GeoBench and LMArena Vision. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next