Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Devstral 2 2512 vs Llama 3.2 1B Instruct

Updated October 21, 2026. 1 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Devstral 2 2512Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
8.6
Output $/M
$2.00
1
Llama 3.2 1B InstructMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
4.8
Output $/M
$0.201
0
vs boards won of 1 shared

Decision reading

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Devstral 2 2512 has the edge where the context window is larger, 262K against 60K tokens.

Shared results
1
Devstral 2 2512 only
5
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct only
36
Like-for-like categories
1 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Devstral 2 2512 not benchmarked, Llama 3.2 1B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
Intelligence, 3.8 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Intelligence Index: Devstral 2 2512 8.6 against Llama 3.2 1B Instruct 4.8, 3.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Devstral 2 2512 $2.00 against Llama 3.2 1B Instruct $0.201 per million output tokens, 10.0x apart.
Context window
Devstral 2 2512 takes 262K tokens, Llama 3.2 1B Instruct 60K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDevstral 2 2512BarsLlama 3.2 1B InstructTies
Intelligence10
All shared boards10
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index8 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512Llama 3.2 1B InstructLeader
SWE-bench Verified53.8%Not measuredOnly Devstral 2 2512 measured
AA Coding Index31.3Not measuredOnly Devstral 2 2512 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)51.8%Not measuredOnly Devstral 2 2512 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)62.8%Not measuredOnly Devstral 2 2512 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured1.9%Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured0.0%Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1070Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1056Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512Llama 3.2 1B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index8.64.8Devstral 2 2512
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512Llama 3.2 1B InstructLeader
AA Agentic Index2.3Not measuredOnly Devstral 2 2512 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured0.0%Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
BALROGNot measured6.6%Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512Llama 3.2 1B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured19.6%Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured5.5%Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured23.9%Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1044Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1007Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1087Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512Llama 3.2 1B InstructLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured0.0Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured0.0%Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured0.6%Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1086Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1098Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512Llama 3.2 1B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured20.0%Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1055Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1009Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1071Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1000Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512Llama 3.2 1B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512Llama 3.2 1B InstructLeader
IFBenchNot measured22.8%Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured6.7%Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
LMArena TextNot measured1055Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1031Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1033Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1117Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured973Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured959Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1014Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured941Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1030Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1050Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1030Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1025Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512Llama 3.2 1B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Devstral 2 2512$0.0014Fits in one request
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct$0.0001Fits in one request

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Devstral 2 2512$0.026Fits in one request
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct$0.0020Fits in one request

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Devstral 2 2512$0.100Fits in one request
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct$0.0074Exceeds the context window

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Devstral 2 2512 and Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
SpecificationMistral Devstral 2 2512Meta Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
MakerMistral AIMeta Llama
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedDecember 9, 2025September 25, 2024
Context window262K60K
Input $/Mtok$0.40$0.027
Output $/Mtok$2.00$0.201
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved task$1.19Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Devstral 2 2512 better than Llama 3.2 1B Instruct for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Devstral 2 2512 has the edge where the context window is larger, 262K against 60K tokens.

Which is cheaper, Devstral 2 2512 or Llama 3.2 1B Instruct?

Devstral 2 2512 costs $0.40 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens; Llama 3.2 1B Instruct costs $0.027 and $0.201. Cost per solved task is known for Devstral 2 2512 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Devstral 2 2512 or Llama 3.2 1B Instruct?

Devstral 2 2512, with 262K tokens against 60K.

How many benchmarks is the Devstral 2 2512 vs Llama 3.2 1B Instruct comparison based on?

1 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Devstral 2 2512's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Llama 3.2 1B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next