Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Devstral 2 2512 vs GPT-4o (2024-05-13)

Devstral 2 2512 leads GPT-4o (2024-05-13) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 8.6 to 7.3, and Devstral 2 2512 costs 7.5x less per output token ($2.00 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 2 benchmarks have a result for both.

Devstral 2 2512Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.00
2
GPT-4o (2024-05-13)OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
27.1
Output $/M
$15.00
0
vs boards won of 2 shared

Devstral 2 2512 or GPT-4o (2024-05-13): which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Devstral 2 2512 for output tokens 7.5x cheaper ($2.00 vs $15.00 per million) and a larger context window (262K against 128K tokens).

Shared results
2
Devstral 2 2512 only
4
GPT-4o (2024-05-13) only
42
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Devstral 2 2512 not benchmarked, GPT-4o (2024-05-13) not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 7.1 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Coding Index: Devstral 2 2512 31.3 against GPT-4o (2024-05-13) 24.2, 7.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Devstral 2 2512 $2.00 against GPT-4o (2024-05-13) $15.00 per million output tokens, 7.5x apart.
Context window
Devstral 2 2512 takes 262K tokens, GPT-4o (2024-05-13) 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDevstral 2 2512BarsGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Ties
Coding10
Intelligence10
All shared boards20
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10
Coding benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and GPT-4o (2024-05-13)
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512GPT-4o (2024-05-13)Leader
SWE-bench Verified53.8%Not measuredOnly Devstral 2 2512 measured
AA Coding Index31.324.2Devstral 2 2512
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)51.8%Not measuredOnly Devstral 2 2512 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)62.8%Not measuredOnly Devstral 2 2512 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured33.4%Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1297Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1297Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and GPT-4o (2024-05-13)
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512GPT-4o (2024-05-13)Leader
AA Intelligence Index8.67.3Devstral 2 2512
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and GPT-4o (2024-05-13)
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512GPT-4o (2024-05-13)Leader
AA Agentic Index2.3Not measuredOnly Devstral 2 2512 measured
METR time horizonsNot measured40.8%Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
BALROGNot measured32.3%Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and GPT-4o (2024-05-13)
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512GPT-4o (2024-05-13)Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured50.2%Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured52.6%Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured1.8%Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured48.9%Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1281Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1250Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1293Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and GPT-4o (2024-05-13)
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512GPT-4o (2024-05-13)Leader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured6.3%Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
MATH level 5Not measured51.0%Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1284Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1284Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and GPT-4o (2024-05-13)
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512GPT-4o (2024-05-13)Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured74.0%Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
MMLUNot measured84.2%Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1295Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1278Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1314Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1262Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and GPT-4o (2024-05-13)
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512GPT-4o (2024-05-13)Leader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and GPT-4o (2024-05-13)
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512GPT-4o (2024-05-13)Leader
LMArena TextNot measured1300Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1278Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1291Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1137Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1312Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1283Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1277Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1283Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1257Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1234Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1304Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1292Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1285Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1365Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1302Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1288Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1298Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1289Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1147Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1132Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and GPT-4o (2024-05-13)
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512GPT-4o (2024-05-13)Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Devstral 2 2512$0.0014Fits in one request
GPT-4o (2024-05-13)$0.013Fits in one request

Devstral 2 2512 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Devstral 2 2512$0.026Fits in one request
GPT-4o (2024-05-13)$0.295Fits in one request

Devstral 2 2512 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Devstral 2 2512$0.100Fits in one request
GPT-4o (2024-05-13)$1.15Exceeds the context window

Devstral 2 2512 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Devstral 2 2512 and GPT-4o (2024-05-13)
SpecificationMistral Devstral 2 2512OpenAI GPT-4o (2024-05-13)
MakerMistral AIOpenAI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedDecember 9, 2025May 13, 2024
Context window262K128K
Input $/Mtok$0.40$5.00
Output $/Mtok$2.00$15.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved task$1.19Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Devstral 2 2512 better than GPT-4o (2024-05-13) for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Devstral 2 2512 for output tokens 7.5x cheaper ($2.00 vs $15.00 per million) and a larger context window (262K against 128K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Devstral 2 2512 or GPT-4o (2024-05-13)?

Devstral 2 2512 costs $0.40 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens; GPT-4o (2024-05-13) costs $5.00 and $15.00. Cost per solved task is known for Devstral 2 2512 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Devstral 2 2512 or GPT-4o (2024-05-13)?

Devstral 2 2512, with 262K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the Devstral 2 2512 vs GPT-4o (2024-05-13) comparison based on?

2 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Devstral 2 2512's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and GPT-4o (2024-05-13)'s on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next