Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Solar Mini 4

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp leads Solar Mini 4 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 34.8 to 24.1, and Solar Mini 4 costs 6.6x less per output token ($0.20 vs $1.32 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 4 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpDeepSeek
Coding
No data
Overall
56.4
Output $/M
$1.32
3
Solar Mini 4Upstage
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.20
1
vs boards won of 4 shared

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or Solar Mini 4: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp for a larger context window (1.05M against 524K tokens) and work measured by Long context reasoning (AA-LCR), where it leads.

Shared results
4
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp only
10
Solar Mini 4 only
3
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp not benchmarked, Solar Mini 4 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Intelligence, 10.7 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Intelligence Index: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp 34.8 against Solar Mini 4 24.1, 10.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp $1.32 against Solar Mini 4 $0.20 per million output tokens, 6.6x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp takes 1.05M tokens, Solar Mini 4 524K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpBarsSolar Mini 4Ties
Coding10
Intelligence10
Reasoning10
General01
All shared boards31
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpSolar Mini 4Leader
LiveBench coding37.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
AA Coding Index65.0Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
SciCode49.7%47.6%DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpSolar Mini 4Leader
AA Intelligence Index34.824.1DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpSolar Mini 4Leader
AA Agentic Index47.5Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
LiveBench research69.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
LiveBench browser64.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
LiveBench long agentic39.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpSolar Mini 4Leader
LiveBench reasoning85.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)91.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)34.5%25.8%DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
MathNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpSolar Mini 4Leader
Neither model has a result on 13 boards here
KnowledgeNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpSolar Mini 4Leader
Neither model has a result on 18 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpSolar Mini 4Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1159Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1109Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1150Only Solar Mini 4 measured
LiveBench design70.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpSolar Mini 4Leader
LiveBench data analysis79.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)81.3%83.3%Solar Mini 4
Neither model has a result on the other 44 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpSolar Mini 4Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp$0.0011Fits in one request
Solar Mini 4$0.0001Fits in one request

Solar Mini 4 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp$0.026Fits in one request
Solar Mini 4$0.0031Fits in one request

Solar Mini 4 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp$0.101Fits in one request
Solar Mini 4$0.012Fits in one request

Solar Mini 4 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Solar Mini 4
SpecificationDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpUpstage Solar Mini 4
MakerDeepSeekUpstage
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 21, 2026September 23, 2026
Context window1.05M524K
Input $/Mtok$0.44$0.05
Output $/Mtok$1.32$0.20
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp better than Solar Mini 4 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp for a larger context window (1.05M against 524K tokens) and work measured by Long context reasoning (AA-LCR), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or Solar Mini 4?

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp costs $0.44 per million input tokens and $1.32 per million output tokens; Solar Mini 4 costs $0.05 and $0.20. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or Solar Mini 4?

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp, with 1.05M tokens against 524K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Solar Mini 4 comparison based on?

4 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Solar Mini 4's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next