Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 cost about the same per output token ($1.32 vs $1.56 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpDeepSeek
Coding
No data
Overall
56.4
Output $/M
$1.32
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Qwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.56
vs $1.32 vs $1.56 per 1M output tokens. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is 1.2x cheaper.

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp for output tokens 1.2x cheaper ($1.32 vs $1.56 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens).

No benchmark has tested both yet. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp has results on LiveBench coding, AA Coding Index and SciCode; Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 on Design Arena: websites, Design Arena: UI components and Design Arena: game dev. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp not benchmarked, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp $1.32 against Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 $1.56 per million output tokens, 1.2x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index3 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Leader
LiveBench coding37.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
AA Coding Index65.0Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
SciCode49.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Leader
AA Intelligence Index34.8Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Leader
AA Agentic Index47.5Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
LiveBench research69.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
LiveBench browser64.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
LiveBench long agentic39.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Leader
LiveBench reasoning85.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)91.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)34.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1187Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1175Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1105Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1135Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1118Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1166Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1107Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1094Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 measured
LiveBench design70.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Leader
LiveBench data analysis79.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)81.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 44 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp$0.0011Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15$0.0010Fits in one request

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp$0.026Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15$0.018Fits in one request

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp$0.101Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15$0.068Fits in one request

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
SpecificationDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
MakerDeepSeekQwen
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 21, 2026February 16, 2026
Context window1.05M1M
Input $/Mtok$0.44$0.26
Output $/Mtok$1.32$1.56
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp better than Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp for output tokens 1.2x cheaper ($1.32 vs $1.56 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens).

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15?

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp costs $0.44 per million input tokens and $1.32 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 costs $0.26 and $1.56. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15?

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

Has any benchmark tested both DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15?

No benchmark has tested both yet. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp has results on LiveBench coding, AA Coding Index and SciCode; Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 on Design Arena: websites, Design Arena: UI components and Design Arena: game dev. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next