Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Llama 3.2 1B Instruct

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp leads Llama 3.2 1B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 34.8 to 4.8, and Llama 3.2 1B Instruct costs 6.6x less per output token ($0.201 vs $1.32 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 4 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpDeepSeek
Coding
No data
Overall
56.4
Output $/M
$1.32
4
Llama 3.2 1B InstructMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
9.6
Output $/M
$0.201
0
vs boards won of 4 shared

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or Llama 3.2 1B Instruct: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp for a larger context window (1.05M against 60K tokens).

Shared results
4
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp only
10
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct only
34
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp not benchmarked, Llama 3.2 1B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
General, 74.7 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp 81.3% against Llama 3.2 1B Instruct 6.7%, 74.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp $1.32 against Llama 3.2 1B Instruct $0.201 per million output tokens, 6.6x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp takes 1.05M tokens, Llama 3.2 1B Instruct 60K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpBarsLlama 3.2 1B InstructTies
Intelligence10
Reasoning20
General10
All shared boards40
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index7 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLlama 3.2 1B InstructLeader
LiveBench coding37.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
AA Coding Index65.0Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured1.9%Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
SciCode49.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured0.0%Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1070Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1056Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLlama 3.2 1B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index34.84.8DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLlama 3.2 1B InstructLeader
AA Agentic Index47.5Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
LiveBench research69.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
LiveBench browser64.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
LiveBench long agentic39.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured0.0%Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
BALROGNot measured6.6%Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)Not measured10.8%Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLlama 3.2 1B InstructLeader
LiveBench reasoning85.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)91.3%19.6%DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)34.5%5.5%DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured23.9%Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1044Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1007Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1087Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLlama 3.2 1B InstructLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured0.0Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured0.0%Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured0.6%Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1086Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1098Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLlama 3.2 1B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured20.0%Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1055Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1009Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1071Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1000Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLlama 3.2 1B InstructLeader
LiveBench design70.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLlama 3.2 1B InstructLeader
LiveBench data analysis79.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
IFBenchNot measured22.8%Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)81.3%6.7%DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
LMArena TextNot measured1055Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1031Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1033Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1117Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured973Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured959Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1014Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured941Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1030Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1050Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1030Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1025Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLlama 3.2 1B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp$0.0011Fits in one request
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct$0.0001Fits in one request

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp$0.026Fits in one request
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct$0.0020Fits in one request

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp$0.101Fits in one request
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct$0.0074Exceeds the context window

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
SpecificationDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpMeta Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
MakerDeepSeekMeta Llama
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 21, 2026September 25, 2024
Context window1.05M60K
Input $/Mtok$0.44$0.027
Output $/Mtok$1.32$0.201
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp better than Llama 3.2 1B Instruct for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp for a larger context window (1.05M against 60K tokens).

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or Llama 3.2 1B Instruct?

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp costs $0.44 per million input tokens and $1.32 per million output tokens; Llama 3.2 1B Instruct costs $0.027 and $0.201. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or Llama 3.2 1B Instruct?

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp, with 1.05M tokens against 60K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Llama 3.2 1B Instruct comparison based on?

4 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Llama 3.2 1B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next