Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Grok Build 0.1

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp leads Grok Build 0.1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 34.8 to 27.2, and DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp costs 1.5x less per output token ($1.32 vs $2.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 2 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpDeepSeek
Coding
No data
Overall
56.4
Output $/M
$1.32
2
Grok Build 0.1xAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.00
0
vs boards won of 2 shared

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or Grok Build 0.1: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp for output tokens 1.5x cheaper ($1.32 vs $2.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 256K tokens).

Shared results
2
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp only
12
Grok Build 0.1 only
1
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp not benchmarked, Grok Build 0.1 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 13.5 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Coding Index: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp 65.0 against Grok Build 0.1 51.5, 13.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp $1.32 against Grok Build 0.1 $2.00 per million output tokens, 1.5x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp takes 1.05M tokens, Grok Build 0.1 256K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpBarsGrok Build 0.1Ties
Coding10
Intelligence10
All shared boards20
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Grok Build 0.1
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpGrok Build 0.1Leader
LiveBench coding37.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
AA Coding Index65.051.5DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured13.4%Only Grok Build 0.1 measured
SciCode49.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Grok Build 0.1
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpGrok Build 0.1Leader
AA Intelligence Index34.827.2DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Grok Build 0.1
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpGrok Build 0.1Leader
AA Agentic Index47.5Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
LiveBench research69.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
LiveBench browser64.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
LiveBench long agentic39.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Grok Build 0.1
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpGrok Build 0.1Leader
LiveBench reasoning85.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)91.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)34.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
MathNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Grok Build 0.1
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpGrok Build 0.1Leader
Neither model has a result on 13 boards here
KnowledgeNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Grok Build 0.1
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpGrok Build 0.1Leader
Neither model has a result on 18 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Grok Build 0.1
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpGrok Build 0.1Leader
LiveBench design70.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Grok Build 0.1
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpGrok Build 0.1Leader
LiveBench data analysis79.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)81.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 44 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Grok Build 0.1
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpGrok Build 0.1Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp$0.0011Fits in one request
Grok Build 0.1$0.0020Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp$0.026Fits in one request
Grok Build 0.1$0.056Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp$0.101Fits in one request
Grok Build 0.1$0.220Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Grok Build 0.1
SpecificationDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpSpaceXAI Grok Build 0.1
MakerDeepSeekxAI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 21, 2026May 20, 2026
Context window1.05M256K
Input $/Mtok$0.44$1.00
Output $/Mtok$1.32$2.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp better than Grok Build 0.1 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp for output tokens 1.5x cheaper ($1.32 vs $2.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 256K tokens).

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or Grok Build 0.1?

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp costs $0.44 per million input tokens and $1.32 per million output tokens; Grok Build 0.1 costs $1.00 and $2.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or Grok Build 0.1?

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Grok Build 0.1 comparison based on?

2 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Grok Build 0.1's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next