Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs GPT-5.1-Codex-Max

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp costs 7.6x less per output token than GPT-5.1-Codex-Max ($1.32 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpDeepSeek
Coding
No data
Overall
56.4
Output $/M
$1.32
GPT-5.1-Codex-MaxOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$10.00
vs $1.32 vs $10.00 per 1M output tokens. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is 7.6x cheaper.

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or GPT-5.1-Codex-Max: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp for output tokens 7.6x cheaper ($1.32 vs $10.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 400K tokens).

No benchmark has tested both yet. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp has results on LiveBench coding, AA Coding Index and SciCode; GPT-5.1-Codex-Max on LiveCodeBench (Vals AI), Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) and Terminal-Bench. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp not benchmarked, GPT-5.1-Codex-Max not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp $1.32 against GPT-5.1-Codex-Max $10.00 per million output tokens, 7.6x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp takes 1.05M tokens, GPT-5.1-Codex-Max 400K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index7 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and GPT-5.1-Codex-Max
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxLeader
LiveBench coding37.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
AA Coding Index65.0Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured83.6%Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Max measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured22.2%Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Max measured
SciCode49.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
Terminal-BenchNot measured60.4%Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Max measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1228.3Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Max measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and GPT-5.1-Codex-Max
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxLeader
AA Intelligence Index34.8Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and GPT-5.1-Codex-Max
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxLeader
AA Agentic Index47.5Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
LiveBench research69.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
LiveBench browser64.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
LiveBench long agentic39.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
METR time horizonsNot measured70.8%Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Max measured
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and GPT-5.1-Codex-Max
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxLeader
LiveBench reasoning85.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)91.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)34.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and GPT-5.1-Codex-Max
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxLeader
ProofBenchNot measured9.0%Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Max measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and GPT-5.1-Codex-Max
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxLeader
LiveBench design70.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and GPT-5.1-Codex-Max
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxLeader
LiveBench data analysis79.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)81.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 44 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp$0.0011Fits in one request
GPT-5.1-Codex-Max$0.0063Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp$0.026Fits in one request
GPT-5.1-Codex-Max$0.092Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp$0.101Fits in one request
GPT-5.1-Codex-Max$0.350Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and GPT-5.1-Codex-Max
SpecificationDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpOpenAI GPT-5.1-Codex-Max
MakerDeepSeekOpenAI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 21, 2026December 4, 2025
Context window1.05M400K
Input $/Mtok$0.44$1.25
Output $/Mtok$1.32$10.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp better than GPT-5.1-Codex-Max for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp for output tokens 7.6x cheaper ($1.32 vs $10.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 400K tokens).

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or GPT-5.1-Codex-Max?

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp costs $0.44 per million input tokens and $1.32 per million output tokens; GPT-5.1-Codex-Max costs $1.25 and $10.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or GPT-5.1-Codex-Max?

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp, with 1.05M tokens against 400K.

Has any benchmark tested both DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and GPT-5.1-Codex-Max?

No benchmark has tested both yet. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp has results on LiveBench coding, AA Coding Index and SciCode; GPT-5.1-Codex-Max on LiveCodeBench (Vals AI), Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) and Terminal-Bench. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next