Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp costs 1.5x less per output token than GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) ($1.32 vs $2.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpDeepSeek
Coding
No data
Overall
56.4
Output $/M
$1.32
GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.00
vs $1.32 vs $2.00 per 1M output tokens. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is 1.5x cheaper.

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613): which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp for output tokens 1.5x cheaper ($1.32 vs $2.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 4K tokens).

No benchmark has tested both yet. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp has results on LiveBench coding, AA Coding Index and SciCode; GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) on GSM8K, MMLU and WinoGrande. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp not benchmarked, GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp $1.32 against GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) $2.00 per million output tokens, 1.5x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp takes 1.05M tokens, GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) 4K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index3 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)Leader
LiveBench coding37.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
AA Coding Index65.0Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
SciCode49.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)Leader
AA Intelligence Index34.8Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)Leader
AA Agentic Index47.5Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
LiveBench research69.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
LiveBench browser64.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
LiveBench long agentic39.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)Leader
LiveBench reasoning85.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)91.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)34.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)Leader
GSM8KNot measured46.9%Only GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)Leader
MMLUNot measured68.9%Only GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)Leader
LiveBench design70.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)Leader
LiveBench data analysis79.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)81.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
WinoGrandeNot measured81.6%Only GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 45 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp$0.0011Fits in one request
GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)$0.0020Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp$0.026Fits in one request
GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)$0.056Exceeds the context window

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp$0.101Fits in one request
GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)$0.220Exceeds the context window

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
SpecificationDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpOpenAI GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
MakerDeepSeekOpenAI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 21, 2026January 25, 2024
Context window1.05M4K
Input $/Mtok$0.44$1.00
Output $/Mtok$1.32$2.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp better than GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp for output tokens 1.5x cheaper ($1.32 vs $2.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 4K tokens).

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)?

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp costs $0.44 per million input tokens and $1.32 per million output tokens; GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) costs $1.00 and $2.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)?

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp, with 1.05M tokens against 4K.

Has any benchmark tested both DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)?

No benchmark has tested both yet. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp has results on LiveBench coding, AA Coding Index and SciCode; GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) on GSM8K, MMLU and WinoGrande. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next