Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Hunyuan A13B Instruct

Hunyuan A13B Instruct costs 1.8x less per output token than DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus ($0.57 vs $1.0142 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

DeepSeek V3.1 TerminusDeepSeek
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.0142
Hunyuan A13B InstructTencent
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.57
vs $1.0142 vs $0.57 per 1M output tokens. Hunyuan A13B Instruct is 1.8x cheaper.

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or Hunyuan A13B Instruct: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus for a larger context window (164K against 131K tokens).

No benchmark has tested both yet. DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has results on AA Coding Index, LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) and SciCode; Hunyuan A13B Instruct has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus not benchmarked, Hunyuan A13B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus $1.0142 against Hunyuan A13B Instruct $0.57 per million output tokens, 1.8x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus takes 164K tokens, Hunyuan A13B Instruct 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index7 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Hunyuan A13B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusHunyuan A13B InstructLeader
AA Coding Index43.5Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)79.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
SciCode38.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)31.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
ALE-Bench745.2Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
LMArena Text: coding1425Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1426Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Hunyuan A13B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusHunyuan A13B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index14.8Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Hunyuan A13B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusHunyuan A13B InstructLeader
AA Agentic Index6.8Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
τ²-Bench Telecom37.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Hunyuan A13B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusHunyuan A13B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)79.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)16.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1426Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1432Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark57.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Hunyuan A13B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusHunyuan A13B InstructLeader
AA Math Index89.7Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)89.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
LMArena Text: math1402Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Hunyuan A13B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusHunyuan A13B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)85.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
LMArena Text: science1451Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1468Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1457Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1414Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Hunyuan A13B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusHunyuan A13B InstructLeader
Design Arena: websites1187Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Design Arena: UI components1180Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Design Arena: game dev1131Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Design Arena: data viz1168Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Design Arena: 3D1141Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Design Arena: all code categories1175Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Design Arena: SVG1065Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index15 boards measured
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Hunyuan A13B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusHunyuan A13B InstructLeader
IFBench57.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)69.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
DTBench81.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
LMCA28.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
LMArena Text1419Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1404Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1403Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
LMArena Text: English1429Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
LMArena Text: non-English1408Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
LMArena Text: Russian1435Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
LMArena Text: Polish1427Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1411Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1422Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1409Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1391Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus$0.0008Fits in one request
Hunyuan A13B Instruct$0.0004Fits in one request

Hunyuan A13B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus$0.018Fits in one request
Hunyuan A13B Instruct$0.0087Fits in one request

Hunyuan A13B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus$0.071Exceeds the context window
Hunyuan A13B Instruct$0.034Exceeds the context window

Hunyuan A13B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Hunyuan A13B Instruct
SpecificationDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusTencent Hunyuan A13B Instruct
MakerDeepSeekTencent
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 22, 2025July 8, 2025
Context window164K131K
Input $/Mtok$0.3063$0.14
Output $/Mtok$1.0142$0.57
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus better than Hunyuan A13B Instruct for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus for a larger context window (164K against 131K tokens).

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or Hunyuan A13B Instruct?

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus costs $0.3063 per million input tokens and $1.0142 per million output tokens; Hunyuan A13B Instruct costs $0.14 and $0.57. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or Hunyuan A13B Instruct?

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus, with 164K tokens against 131K.

Has any benchmark tested both DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Hunyuan A13B Instruct?

No benchmark has tested both yet. DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has results on AA Coding Index, LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) and SciCode; Hunyuan A13B Instruct has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next