Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Moondream 3 Preview

Updated October 21, 2026. 0 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

DeepSeek V3.1 TerminusDeepSeek
Coding
No data
Overall
14.8
Output $/M
$1.0142
M Moondream 3 PreviewMoondream
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.50
vs $1.0142 vs $2.50 per 1M output tokens. DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus is 2.5x cheaper.

Decision reading

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has the edge where output tokens cost 2.5x less, and where the context window is larger, 164K against 32K tokens.

Shared results
0
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus only
44
Moondream 3 Preview only
0
Like-for-like categories
0 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus not benchmarked, Moondream 3 Preview not benchmarked.
Widest category
No category has a result for both models.
Widest single gap
No benchmark has a result for both models.
Output price
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus $1.0142 against Moondream 3 Preview $2.50 per million output tokens, 2.5x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus takes 164K tokens, Moondream 3 Preview 32K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index7 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Moondream 3 Preview
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusMoondream 3 PreviewLeader
AA Coding Index43.5Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)79.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
SciCode38.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)31.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
ALE-Bench745.2Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
LMArena Text: coding1425Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1426Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Moondream 3 Preview
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusMoondream 3 PreviewLeader
AA Intelligence Index14.8Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Moondream 3 Preview
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusMoondream 3 PreviewLeader
AA Agentic Index6.8Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
τ²-Bench Telecom37.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Moondream 3 Preview
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusMoondream 3 PreviewLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)79.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)16.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1426Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1432Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Moondream 3 Preview
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusMoondream 3 PreviewLeader
AA Math Index89.7Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)89.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
LMArena Text: math1402Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Moondream 3 Preview
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusMoondream 3 PreviewLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)85.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
LMArena Text: science1451Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1468Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1457Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1414Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Moondream 3 Preview
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusMoondream 3 PreviewLeader
Design Arena: websites1187Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Design Arena: UI components1182Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Design Arena: game dev1131Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Design Arena: data viz1167Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Design Arena: 3D1141Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Design Arena: all code categories1175Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Design Arena: SVG1065Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index15 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Moondream 3 Preview
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusMoondream 3 PreviewLeader
IFBench57.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)69.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
DTBench81.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
LMCA28.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
LMArena Text1419Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1404Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1403Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
LMArena Text: English1429Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
LMArena Text: non-English1408Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
LMArena Text: Russian1435Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
LMArena Text: Polish1427Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1411Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1422Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1409Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1391Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Moondream 3 Preview
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusMoondream 3 PreviewLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus$0.0008Fits in one request
Moondream 3 Preview$0.0015Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus$0.018Fits in one request
Moondream 3 Preview$0.022Exceeds the context window

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus$0.071Exceeds the context window
Moondream 3 Preview$0.085Exceeds the context window

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Moondream 3 Preview
SpecificationDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusMoondream 3 Preview
MakerDeepSeekMoondream
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 22, 2025October 15, 2026
Context window164K32K
Input $/Mtok$0.3063$0.30
Output $/Mtok$1.0142$2.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus better than Moondream 3 Preview for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has the edge where output tokens cost 2.5x less, and where the context window is larger, 164K against 32K tokens.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or Moondream 3 Preview?

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus costs $0.3063 per million input tokens and $1.0142 per million output tokens; Moondream 3 Preview costs $0.30 and $2.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or Moondream 3 Preview?

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus, with 164K tokens against 32K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Moondream 3 Preview comparison based on?

0 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Moondream 3 Preview's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next