Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

R1 0528 vs Hy3 preview

Hy3 preview leads R1 0528 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 25.3 to 13.1, and Hy3 preview costs 3.6x less per output token ($0.60 vs $2.18 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 31 benchmarks have a result for both.

R1 0528DeepSeek
Coding
No data
Overall
46.8
Output $/M
$2.18
16
Hy3 previewTencent
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
15
vs boards won of 31 shared

R1 0528 or Hy3 preview: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick R1 0528 for work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Shared results
31
R1 0528 only
29
Hy3 preview only
5
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
R1 0528 not benchmarked, Hy3 preview not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 56.1 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: R1 0528 36.5% against Hy3 preview 92.7%, 56.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
R1 0528 $2.18 against Hy3 preview $0.60 per million output tokens, 3.6x apart.
Context window
R1 0528 takes 164K tokens, Hy3 preview 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryR1 0528BarsHy3 previewTies
Coding21
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning23
Math02
Knowledge31
General96
All shared boards1615
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index21
Coding benchmarks for R1 0528 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkR1 0528Hy3 previewLeader
Aider polyglot71.4%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1357Only Hy3 preview measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured58.8Only Hy3 preview measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)77.0%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)15.9%34.1%Hy3 preview
WeirdML41.6%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
ALE-Bench804.1Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: coding14271421R1 0528
LMArena Text: software and IT14351423R1 0528
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1349Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1356Only Hy3 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for R1 0528 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkR1 0528Hy3 previewLeader
AA Intelligence Index13.125.3Hy3 preview
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for R1 0528 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkR1 0528Hy3 previewLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured24.1Only Hy3 preview measured
τ²-Bench Telecom36.5%92.7%Hy3 preview
METR time horizons53.8%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
DeepResearch Bench35.1%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
BrowseComp-Plus16.4%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index23
Reasoning benchmarks for R1 0528 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkR1 0528Hy3 previewLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)81.3%86.7%Hy3 preview
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)15.8%27.8%Hy3 preview
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)76.3%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
ARC-AGI21.2%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
ARC-AGI-21.1%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
SimpleBench40.8%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14151413R1 0528
LMArena Text: expert13941422Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14221416R1 0528
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for R1 0528 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkR1 0528Hy3 previewLeader
AA Math Index76.0Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)76.0%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
OTIS Mock AIME66.4%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
MATH level 596.6%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: math14001424Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: mathematical work14151442Hy3 preview
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index31
Knowledge benchmarks for R1 0528 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkR1 0528Hy3 previewLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)84.9%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: science14301416R1 0528
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14451405R1 0528
LMArena Text: legal and government14191430Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: business and finance14021397R1 0528
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for R1 0528 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkR1 0528Hy3 previewLeader
Design Arena: websites1149Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Design Arena: UI components1100Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Design Arena: game dev1097Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Design Arena: data viz1182Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Design Arena: 3D1110Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1138Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Design Arena: SVG1038Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index96
General benchmarks for R1 0528 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkR1 0528Hy3 previewLeader
IFBench39.6%63.1%Hy3 preview
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)55.7%64.7%Hy3 preview
Fiction.LiveBench75.0%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)81.9%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text14281401R1 0528
LMArena Text: instruction following13821383Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: creative writing14051339R1 0528
LMArena Text: English14371409R1 0528
LMArena Text: non-English14121390R1 0528
LMArena Text: Chinese14421435R1 0528
LMArena Text: German1404Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1391Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1360Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: French14171425Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: Spanish14111399R1 0528
LMArena Text: Russian14231399R1 0528
LMArena Text: Polish1428Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14051411Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: longer queries13911402Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: writing and language14021370R1 0528
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14001352R1 0528
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for R1 0528 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkR1 0528Hy3 previewLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

R1 0528$0.0016Fits in one request
Hy3 preview$0.0005Fits in one request

Hy3 preview costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

R1 0528$0.032Fits in one request
Hy3 preview$0.011Fits in one request

Hy3 preview costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

R1 0528$0.122Exceeds the context window
Hy3 preview$0.042Fits in one request

Hy3 preview costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of R1 0528 and Hy3 preview
SpecificationDeepSeek R1 0528Tencent Hy3 preview
MakerDeepSeekTencent
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedMay 28, 2025April 22, 2026
Context window164K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.50$0.18
Output $/Mtok$2.18$0.60
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is R1 0528 better than Hy3 preview for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick R1 0528 for work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, R1 0528 or Hy3 preview?

R1 0528 costs $0.50 per million input tokens and $2.18 per million output tokens; Hy3 preview costs $0.18 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, R1 0528 or Hy3 preview?

Hy3 preview, with 262K tokens against 164K.

How many benchmarks is the R1 0528 vs Hy3 preview comparison based on?

31 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. R1 0528's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Hy3 preview's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next