Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

R1 0528 vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

R1 0528 leads Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 13.1 to 9.9, at about the same output price ($2.18 vs $1.90 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 39 benchmarks have a result for both.

R1 0528DeepSeek
Coding
No data
Overall
46.8
Output $/M
$2.18
16
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.90
23
vs boards won of 39 shared

R1 0528 or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick R1 0528 for work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Shared results
39
R1 0528 only
24
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct only
10
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
R1 0528 not benchmarked, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 17.5 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: R1 0528 36.5% against Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct 54.1%, 17.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
R1 0528 $2.18 against Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct $1.90 per million output tokens, 1.1x apart.
Context window
R1 0528 takes 164K tokens, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryR1 0528BarsQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructTies
Coding22
Intelligence10
Agentic work01
Reasoning23
Math04
Knowledge23
General910
All shared boards1623
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index22
Coding benchmarks for R1 0528 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkR1 0528Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
Aider polyglot71.4%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)77.0%64.6%R1 0528
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)15.9%11.4%R1 0528
WeirdML41.6%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
ALE-Bench804.1Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: coding14271438Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: software and IT14351442Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for R1 0528 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkR1 0528Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index13.19.9R1 0528
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for R1 0528 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkR1 0528Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom36.5%54.1%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
METR time horizons53.8%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
DeepResearch Bench35.1%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
BrowseComp-Plus16.4%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index23
Reasoning benchmarks for R1 0528 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkR1 0528Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)81.3%77.2%R1 0528
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)15.8%11.9%R1 0528
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)76.3%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
ARC-AGI21.2%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
ARC-AGI-21.1%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
SimpleBench40.8%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14151428Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: expert13931442Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14221439Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1255Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1277Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Math benchmarks for R1 0528 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkR1 0528Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
AA Math Index76.088.3Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)76.0%88.3%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
OTIS Mock AIME66.4%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
MATH level 596.6%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: math14001425Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: mathematical work14151419Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
MathArena12.9%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index23
Knowledge benchmarks for R1 0528 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkR1 0528Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)84.9%83.6%R1 0528
LMArena Text: science14301445Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14451431R1 0528
LMArena Text: legal and government14191438Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: business and finance14011433Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
PRBench Finance32.7%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
PRBench Legal36.6%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for R1 0528 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkR1 0528Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
Design Arena: websites1149Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Design Arena: UI components1100Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Design Arena: game dev1097Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Design Arena: data viz1183Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Design Arena: 3D1112Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1138Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Design Arena: SVG1038Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index910
General benchmarks for R1 0528 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkR1 0528Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
IFBench39.6%56.5%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)55.7%63.7%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Fiction.LiveBench75.0%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)81.9%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text14281420R1 0528
LMArena Text: instruction following13811406Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: creative writing14051366R1 0528
LMArena VisionNot measured1247Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: English14371429R1 0528
LMArena Text: non-English14121405R1 0528
LMArena Text: Chinese14421462Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: German14041424Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Japanese13911385R1 0528
LMArena Text: Korean13591394Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: French14171452Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Spanish14111428Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Russian14231408R1 0528
LMArena Text: Polish14281419R1 0528
LMArena Text: multi-turn14041428Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: longer queries13911420Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: writing and language14011393R1 0528
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14001368R1 0528
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1256Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1283Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1253Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1209Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1281Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1249Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1220Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for R1 0528 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkR1 0528Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

R1 0528$0.0016Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.0012Fits in one request

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

R1 0528$0.032Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.016Fits in one request

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

R1 0528$0.122Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.061Fits in one request

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of R1 0528 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
SpecificationDeepSeek R1 0528Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
MakerDeepSeekQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedMay 28, 2025September 23, 2025
Context window164K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.50$0.21
Output $/Mtok$2.18$1.90
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is R1 0528 better than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick R1 0528 for work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, R1 0528 or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

R1 0528 costs $0.50 per million input tokens and $2.18 per million output tokens; Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs $0.21 and $1.90. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, R1 0528 or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct, with 262K tokens against 164K.

How many benchmarks is the R1 0528 vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct comparison based on?

39 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. R1 0528's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next