Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

R1 0528 vs Nemotron 3 Super

R1 0528 leads Nemotron 3 Super on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 13.1 to 12.8, and Nemotron 3 Super costs 4.8x less per output token ($0.45 vs $2.18 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 36 benchmarks have a result for both.

Replace R1 0528 Replace Nemotron 3 Super
R1 0528DeepSeek
Coding
No data
Overall
46.8
Output $/M
$2.18
28
Nemotron 3 SuperNVIDIA
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.45
8
vs boards won of 36 shared

R1 0528 or Nemotron 3 Super: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick R1 0528 for work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or τ²-Bench Telecom, where it leads.

Model AR1 0528DeepSeekNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BNemotron 3 SuperNVIDIANot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved task
Shared results
36
R1 0528 only
27
Nemotron 3 Super only
3
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
R1 0528 not benchmarked, Nemotron 3 Super not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 31.3 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
IFBench: R1 0528 39.6% against Nemotron 3 Super 71.5%, 31.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
R1 0528 $2.18 against Nemotron 3 Super $0.45 per million output tokens, 4.8x apart.
Context window
R1 0528 takes 164K tokens, Nemotron 3 Super 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryR1 0528BarsNemotron 3 SuperTies
Coding41
Intelligence10
Agentic work01
Reasoning32
Math21
Knowledge40
General143
All shared boards288
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index41
Coding benchmarks for R1 0528 and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkR1 0528Nemotron 3 SuperLeader
Aider polyglot71.4%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured37.7Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)77.0%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
SciCodeNot measured36.2%Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)15.9%28.8%Nemotron 3 Super
WeirdML41.6%38.0%R1 0528
ALE-Bench804.1213.9R1 0528
LMArena Text: coding14271403R1 0528
LMArena Text: software and IT14351409R1 0528
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for R1 0528 and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkR1 0528Nemotron 3 SuperLeader
AA Intelligence Index13.112.8R1 0528
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for R1 0528 and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkR1 0528Nemotron 3 SuperLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured1.7Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
τ²-Bench Telecom36.5%67.8%Nemotron 3 Super
METR time horizons53.8%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
DeepResearch Bench35.1%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
BrowseComp-Plus16.4%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index32
Reasoning benchmarks for R1 0528 and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkR1 0528Nemotron 3 SuperLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)81.3%80.0%R1 0528
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)15.8%20.8%Nemotron 3 Super
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)76.3%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
ARC-AGI21.2%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
ARC-AGI-21.1%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
SimpleBench40.8%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14151386R1 0528
LMArena Text: expert13941398Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14221397R1 0528
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index21
Math benchmarks for R1 0528 and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkR1 0528Nemotron 3 SuperLeader
AA Math Index76.0Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)76.0%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
OTIS Mock AIME66.4%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
MATH level 596.6%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: math14001380R1 0528
LMArena Text: mathematical work14151405R1 0528
MathArena12.9%16.6%Nemotron 3 Super
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for R1 0528 and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkR1 0528Nemotron 3 SuperLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)84.9%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: science14301387R1 0528
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14451383R1 0528
LMArena Text: legal and government14191392R1 0528
LMArena Text: business and finance14021364R1 0528
PRBench Finance32.7%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
PRBench Legal36.6%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for R1 0528 and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkR1 0528Nemotron 3 SuperLeader
Design Arena: websites1149Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Design Arena: UI components1100Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Design Arena: game dev1097Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Design Arena: data viz1182Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Design Arena: 3D1110Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1138Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Design Arena: SVG1038Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index143
General benchmarks for R1 0528 and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkR1 0528Nemotron 3 SuperLeader
IFBench39.6%71.5%Nemotron 3 Super
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)55.7%65.7%Nemotron 3 Super
Fiction.LiveBench75.0%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)81.9%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text14281378R1 0528
LMArena Text: instruction following13821347R1 0528
LMArena Text: creative writing14051317R1 0528
LMArena Text: English14371400R1 0528
LMArena Text: non-English14121356R1 0528
LMArena Text: Chinese14421431R1 0528
LMArena Text: German14041341R1 0528
LMArena Text: Japanese1391Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1360Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: French14171403R1 0528
LMArena Text: Spanish14111418Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: Russian14231336R1 0528
LMArena Text: Polish14281346R1 0528
LMArena Text: multi-turn14051369R1 0528
LMArena Text: longer queries13911362R1 0528
LMArena Text: writing and language14021332R1 0528
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14001336R1 0528
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for R1 0528 and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkR1 0528Nemotron 3 SuperLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

R1 0528$0.0016Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Super$0.0003Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Super costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

R1 0528$0.032Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Super$0.0056Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Super costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

R1 0528$0.122Exceeds the context window
Nemotron 3 Super$0.021Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Super costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of R1 0528 and Nemotron 3 Super
SpecificationDeepSeek R1 0528NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super
MakerDeepSeekNVIDIA
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedMay 28, 2025March 11, 2026
Context window164K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.50$0.085
Output $/Mtok$2.18$0.45
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is R1 0528 better than Nemotron 3 Super for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick R1 0528 for work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or τ²-Bench Telecom, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, R1 0528 or Nemotron 3 Super?

R1 0528 costs $0.50 per million input tokens and $2.18 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3 Super costs $0.085 and $0.45. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, R1 0528 or Nemotron 3 Super?

Nemotron 3 Super, with 262K tokens against 164K.

How many benchmarks is the R1 0528 vs Nemotron 3 Super comparison based on?

36 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. R1 0528's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Nemotron 3 Super's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next